12/24/18

Man and Sin by Piet Schoonenberg (1964) 2.3 RQ

[In postmodern scholasticism, the words “obligation” and “responsibility” should be placed back into the following configuration:

In general, obligations3a(2a are co-opposed to exercises of the heart2a(1a).

(This holds even though the heart2 does not appear in the interscoping forms.)

‘Responsibility3a(2a’ is opposed to ‘freedom2a(1a)’.

‘Words3a(2a’ are co-opposed to ‘bondage2a(1a)’.

‘Responsibility3a(2a’ is opposed to ‘words3a(2a’.

‘Freedom2a(1a)’ is opposed to ‘bondage2a(1a)’.]

12/14/18

Man and Sin by Piet Schoonenberg (1964) 2.3 RK

Summary of text [comment] pages 83 and 84

[The co-opposition of responsibility and freedom allows us to appreciate Schoonenberg ‘s text more fully.

Schoonenberg’s key opposition is between bondage and freedom.

Bondage is in co-opposition with words (expressions and impositions of organizationalobjectives and thinkgroup).

Freedom is in co-opposition to responsibility.]