Summary of text [comment] page 31
First, let us consider an example of the Dutch logic tree of sin.
Here is my analogy.
Professionals, people trained to perform within a certain discipline, perform tasks. Here are two examples where tasks go awry:
First, on the subjective pole, a routine action may suddenly not feel right. The reason becomes apparent. Corrections follow.
Second, on the objective pole, a routine action may go completely smoothly then, later, the professional finds something horribly wrong. This is the nightmare of every medical professional. Guess who operated on the wrong patient.
[This example resonates with the scholastic view that a venial sin is a disorder concerning the means and a mortal sin is a disorder concerning the end.
Now let us apply this to the Dutch logic tree.
Both types mirror “transgression of God’s law”.
Both types relate to “important matters”.
Neither was committed with “full knowledge”.
Consequently, neither type was “committed freely”.
But clearly, one type is objectively worse than the other.]