0296 The so-called “Prague spring” (B) occurs in the middle of the first iteration of the TMS.

1968 runs into a disturbance, a black swan event, and…

0297 …the path changes, from a movement that would have mimicked triumphalist science to something far more confounding.

0298 Remember, the perspective level of the fundament three-level interscope presents a model (from the empirio-schematic judgment) that should overlay the noumenon (in the Positivist’s judgment).

0299 The perspective-level actuality_2c (what ought to be, Positivist’s judgment) should have proceeded to overlay the noumenon_1a (what is, Positivist’s judgment), but that would produce an obvious discrepancy with the Marxist theory of the substantiation of human conditions by material arrangements.

0300 Instead (C), the perspective-level model_2c enters the content level of a new derivative interscope, that will eventually constellate the claim.

Furthermore (D), the entangled matter gets confounded with the contiguities in a two level interscope that coheres to Lotman’s move to include cultural studies (described in section six (6)), in a way that does not make a claim contradicting regime sustaining Marxist models.

0301 Let me dwell on the instead (C).

The entrance follows the path of the interventional-sign relation, which is discussed in Looking at John Deely’s Book (2010) “Semiotic Animal”, appearing in Razie Mah’s blog for October, 2023.

0302 Here is a diagram.

0303 In the triadic structure of a sign-relation, a sign-vehicle (SV) stands for a sign-object (SO) in regards to a sign-interpretant (SI).

This interventional sign relation crosses from the perspective-level of the fundament interscope to the content-level of the derivative interscope.

It also passes from the empirio-schematic judgment to the Positivist’s judgment.

0304 A semiological_2a structuralist_2b model_2c (SV_i) stands for the dyad, {literary text as form_2af (SO_i) [entangles] language as matter_2am} in regards to the TMS positivist intellect_3a operating on the potential of ‘meaning’_1a (SI_i).

0305 In short, Lotman and his collaborators make an intuitive leap from the language of the mother-tongue, the subject matter for semiology and structuralism, to a language of meaning, presence and message that will… um… act as matterthat substantiates forms that are relevant to… hmmm… the entangled claim.