0207 At this juncture, Juri Lotman and his collaborators achieve the fundament interscope and are well way on their way to build a new – aesthetic – derivative interscope, founded on a refashioning of the Positivist’s judgment.

The new interscope will exploit the advantages of a complete thought (the three-level fundament interscope) that captures talk about literature.

Indeed, this complete thought offers a a model that presents itself as the noumenon, the literary text itself_2af.

0208 Here is a picture.

0209 Section four (4) offers clues as to where Lotman is heading.

He aims to construct a field of inquiry that… um… capitalizes on the presentation of a novel “noumenon”, resulting in a transformation of the Positivist’s judgment.

0210 Oh, I mean “situates”, instead of “exploits”.

After all, everyone at this time is supposed to be a communist.

Plus, I already know that… since the form of aesthetics entangles the matter of cultural studies, then aesthetics can be a challenging topic.

0211 Here is a picture.

0212 How do I view the authors’ narrative?

Science remains paramount in the Soviet regime, so Lotman’s success at identifying a construct that veils the noumenonremains angled towards science.

Section four mentions how cybernetics emerges as a priority, immediately after the end of the Second World War.  Indeed, research funding goes into cybernetics.  So, I assume that the entangled language_2am in the actuality_2a on the content-level of the derivative interscope situates the potential of cybernetic meanings, presences and messages_1a.

Does that compute?

In this regard, Lotman publishes two works in 1967.  One is titled “The Study of Literature as an Exact Science”.  The other is titled “Exact Methods in Soviet Literary Studies”.

0213 Surely, Lotman is a genius in regards to agenda management.

The Institute of Cybernetics is established at Tallinn University of Technology in Estonia in 1960.

The potential of meaning_1a shifts accordingly, because the entangled language_2am is virtually situated by inquiry into cybernetics_3b.

0214 Here is a picture.

0215 In the realm of possibility, note how the content level retains the possibility of meaning_1a.  Plus, the newly realized situation level offers the possibility of presence_1b.

The potential of ‘codes’_1b is now present, because cybernetics is all about codes and control.  Codes_1b potentiate some sort of matter that may be labeled, “cognition_2bm“, and some sort of form that may be labeled, “interaction_1bf“.

Too bad that humans are not robots.