0022 From the prior blogs, I arrive at a two-level interscope.
0023 The crux of Turbon’s article resides in the last sentence of the abstract.
Whatever2a makes humans distinctive1a in the normal context of evolution3a should be “digestible” by whatever2b makes humans distinctive1b in the normal context of our own intuition3b.
0024 Turbon’s appeal fails when evolution3 excludes intuition3.
Turbon’s appeal will succeed when evolution3a and intuition3b align.
0025 In order to be “digestible”, scientific origins of human beings2a ought to be capable of being virtually situated by a coherent origins2b, arising from the potential of ‘something distinctive’1b, in the normal context of human intuition3b.
What disciplines guide human intuition3b?
Philosophy and theology.