Man and Sin by Piet Schoonenberg (1964) 2.3 AW

Summary of text [comment] page 81

[Elitist (infra)sovereign consciencelacking is more spiritual (thus, more dehumanizing) than the spineless consciencelacking of a person whose flesh is in bondage to seeking pleasure and avoiding pain.

Why?

In the former, interpellation of thinkdivine has been rendered impossible.

Religionsovereign marks the contextualizing of concupiscence by cruelty. Concupiscence requires self-justification. Cruelty requires blasphemy.

Thinkpro-object promotes self-justification.

Hatred of the anti-object produces blasphemy.]