[Now, I want to compare something2a to parole2a.
Parole2a is the actuality in the content level of the system of differences of language.
The nested form is:
A system…3a( parole2a( …of differences1a))]
Summary of text [comment] page 83
[In virtue, I take my responsibilities and freedom for granted.
My responsibility corresponds to mirror of the world3a(something2a(___1a)).
My freedom corresponds to __3a( something2a( potentials of me1a)).
In sin, I take my words and my bondage for granted.]
[What is this mirror3a that I am obligated to engage whenever ‘I choose something’?
It is a source of reflectivity that I always seem to ignore.
It reflects the perspective level, the Zeitgiest, in a highly personal manner.]
[So I pray (or think about it).
The interscope becomes an intersection.
The non-contemplative acts.
The contemplative prays.]
[My choice2b can validate the expectations in the report3a.
My friend’s report3a expects to arouse my desire1a.
If I make a choice2b, I validate the thought experiment3a, even if it turns out that there are no good apples at the market.
Then I do2b something foolish.
I purchase undesirable apples at a high price.]
Summary of text [comment] page 83
[A report of apples at the market3a acts as a mirror in which I see I can make applesauce and stock up for the winter2a in the potentials inherent in me1a.
If I focus on the opportunity for making applesauce2a, then I address my desire1a.
If I ask myself, “Is this what I value1b?”, then I question my desire1a.]
[If I am contemplative, I do not seamlessly fold the content-level into the situation-level nested form.
That is sensible thinking.
The contemplative is aware of the dangers of the interscope.]
[Back to the applesauce example, I got to a place where something2a consisted in the actuality of the opportunity to make apple sauce.
‘This something2a’ is virtually situated by ‘my choice2b’, in the following nested form:
I, seat of choice3b( my choice2b( the potential of something2b))
If I am not contemplative, the potential of me1a is subsumed into I choose2b.
No further articulation needed.
I decide to make applesauce.
The interscope remains an interscope.]
Summary of text [comment] page 83
[Opportunity is sandwiched between responsibility and freedom.
Is opportunity sandwiched between words and bondage?
I have a better word: ‘temptation’.
Temptation is sandwiched between words and bondage.
Opportunity and temptation belong to the single actuality that is ‘my heart2’.]
