Looking at Lesley Newson and Peter Richerson’s Book (2021) “A Story of Us” (Part 5 of 16)

0034 To review.

The situation level of the following diagram addresses “adaptation”.  The content level concerns “phenotype.  This two-level interscope touches base with the authors’ biological expertise.

Figure 12

The above interscope veils a more intuitive content level, where the normal context is what is happening3a, the actuality is some sort of activity2a and the potential is that ‘something’ is happening1a.

Figure 13

Finally, depending on the content level, there are two situation-level actualities2b available.

Figure 14

The first concerns signals.  The second entails signs.

0035 Is there another way to diagram evolution?

One answer is that adaptation2 and phenotype2 are actualities in two nested forms.  Together, they constitute an intersection, defined as an actuality2 composed of two actualities.

For roads, an intersection is where two roads meet.   It is a single actuality constituted by two actualities.  On top of that, it is full of contradictions, hence the necessity of traffic regulations.

The intersection of adaptation2 and phenotype2 is no different.   Each arises from a distinct potential.  That potential situates a content-level actuality.

0036 Here is the natural history side of Neodarwinism.

Figure 15

The normal context of natural selection3b brings the actuality of adaptation2b into relation with a niche1b.  The niche1b is the potential1b of an actuality independent of the adapting species2a

Notably, Newson and Richerson are not aware that the actuality independent of the adapting Homo genus2a is … um… found in Razie Mah’s masterwork, The Human Niche.  To some degree, this ignorance explains the hidden ingredient,discussed earlier.

Here is the genetics side of Neodarwinism.

Figure 16

The normal context of body development3b brings the actuality of the phenotype2b into relation with its genotype1b.  The genotype1b is the potential1b of each individual specimen’s DNA2a.

0037 Now the actualities of adaptation2 and phenotype2 constitute a single actuality, which may be labeled “individual”, “species” or “genus”.  Here, the term, “species”, is used.

Figure 17

0038 This relational structure is developed in Razie Mah’s e-books, Speculations on Thomism and Evolution and Comments on Dennis Venema and Scot McKnight’s Book (2017) Adam and the Genome, along with other works in the series, A Course on Evolution and Thomism.