0040 Given the tussle between the established players of the Department of Education and the Secretary of the Same Department, I wonder.
Are there any other tussles going on?
After all, this rhetorical game of element substitution for the interscope of BG(il)L education can also be played by factions within the Department of Education itself.
0043 The Department of Education’s BG(il)L perspective serves the interests of a central government attempting to manage individual ambitions by providing pathways to specializations2b, hence jobs1b, through certification2a. The central government engages in cultural selection3b (in the specializations that they regulate) and individual selection3b (in that individuals exercise automony1a in their alignment with BG(il)L incentives1a towards certification2a).
0044 So, what happens if factions within the central government desire more?
What if a faction desires to manage the individual itself?
How weird can BG3c(il)L1c get?
0045 Well, I already know that, in some universities in the West, social constructivism replaces all fields of inquiry that presume that humans encounter mind-independent realities (including the reality of others’ mind-dependent beings, both past and present).
Indeed, social constructivism replaces the potential of truth with the potential of the human will.
Or, something like that.
0046 See Looking at Sad Gaad’s Book (2020) Parasitic Mind, at Razie Mah’s blog, running in April 2023.
What do individuals socially construct?
My identity becomes my job1b.
The group that I identify with becomes my specialization2b. Another word for specialization is “lifestyle2b“. What are your chosen pronouns?
Individual and cultural selection3b then morphs into group-identity… er… lifestyle selection3b.
0047 Here is a picture of the substitutions on the situation level.
0048 For the perspective level, BG(il)L interventions3c replace big government3c.
These interventions3c select in favor of some lifestyles3b (take a guess, I bet that none of the guesses describe Betsy DeVos) and against other lifestyles3b (take a guess, I bet that many of the guesses apply to Betsy DeVos).
Indeed, a whole new suite of expertise is demanded. This expertise2c is capable of explaining BG(il)L perspective-level interventions3c in terms of social justice, critical theory and social constructivism. Interventional expertise2c emerges from (and situates) the potential of ‘certainty’1c. In turn, certainty1c virtually contextualizes identity1b. Plus, identity1bvirtually situates the personal choice that one is groomed for1a.
0049 Here is how the “woke” faction of the Department of Education alters the three-level interscope of BG(il)L.