Summary of text [comment] page 41
[“Evil3” resonates with “determination of the status3 of the … subject(3)”.
Is subject(3) the same as subject(1), “the potential from which the action proceeds1”?
The answer is typically “no”.
Consider Schoonenberg’s example.]
Schoonenberg used the example of an earthquake creating a physical evil – a privation of good – that catastrophically alters the status of living beings, changing the conditions so that these living beings – limited by metaphysical evil – die.
[This can be written in nested form:
… determines status of natural subjects(3); living forms(3)( earthquake that radically alters habitat2( … proceeds from natural subject1; geological processes1))
“The determination of status” pertains to “subject(3)”.
Subject(3) is not necessarily identical to subject1.]