[There is a certain irony to the fact that, currently, in 2014, the term “objective” covers two very different concepts.  Here is the first:

Human action₂ is “objective” because it can be objectively observed by a disinterested scientist.

Human action₂ is an “object” that is contextualized through knowledge₃.  This is described in the the category crossing of two nested forms:

knowledge₃₍₂₎ = acceptance or denial of law^essential as well as think^{one_way_or_another} contextualizing the situation₂

The term “knowledge₃” labels the emergence of judgments on both the natural philosophical and the moral religious axes of the intersecting nested forms.]