Summary of text [comment] page 29
The question of the difference between “venial” and “mortal” sin was addressed by the Scholastics, including Saint Thomas Aquinas. Aquinas defined “mortal” sin as a disorder concerning the end itself and a “venial” sin as a disorder concerning the means.
[From the perspective of the intersecting nested forms, the “end itself” corresponds to “how sin is conceived and contextualized”. That corresponds to consciencelacking and thinkgroup. Mortal sins serve to habituate the former and reify the latter. This precisely fits Aquinas concept of “mortal sin” as “a disorder concerning the end itself”.
At the same time, the intersecting nested forms reveal another dimension. Sinful acts also participate in the nested form along the horizontal axis.
Sinful acts reward certain dispositions over others. Since both dispositions and conscience belong to the monadic realm of possibility, they cannot be totally distinguished, so the appeasing of dispositions and the fixing consciencelacking may feel indistinguishable.]