Summary of text [comment] pages 25, 26 & 27
[Do these lists of particular transgressions tell us what “sin” is?
Does the word “sin” cover more than the realm of human action, the realm of actuality?
The answer is no and yes.
With the intersecting nested forms in mind, we can sense how “the realm of actuality” both fixes the range of possibilities and promotes “ways of thought” that justify its own configuration. These too, may be caught in the label of “sin”.]