Category Archives: Interscope & Intersection
Man and Sin by Piet Schoonenberg (1964) 2.3 WQ
Summary of text [comment] page 85
[In the astrological fixation, the fate of the person is determined by the alignment of the planets and stars.
Does this sound like a deterministic thought experiment3H or a contender for I, seat of choice3V?]
Man and Sin by Piet Schoonenberg (1964) 2.3 WN
Summary of text [comment] page 85
[The questions in the previous blogs correlate with the normal contexts of the thought experiment where ‘I choose something’.
Consider the two-level interscope, then the intersection.]
Man and Sin by Piet Schoonenberg (1964) 2.3 WH
[My choice2V and something about me2H solidify into concupiscence, then into cruelty.
Like a dead person, the eyes are open but they cannot see.
Death is the fixation of law. Death is the illusion of words.
Death becomes the mandala of the heart.]
Man and Sin by Piet Schoonenberg (1964) 2.3 WG
[Sin enters through the mirror of the world3H. Sin is the lie within the mirror.
Words. Arguments. Excuses.
They increase my bondage and reduce my capacity for responsibilities.]
Man and Sin by Piet Schoonenberg (1964) 2.3 WF
[Law enters through I, seat of choice3V. It fixates on the something that I may choose1V. My deeds become more and more repetitive. My deeds fall in line with my fixation.]
Man and Sin by Piet Schoonenberg (1964) 2.3 WE
Summary of text [comment] page 85
[We may freely choose one of two hearts.
Sin, law and death resides in one heart.]
Man and Sin by Piet Schoonenberg (1964) 2.3 WD
[The mandala of responsibilities, thoughts, freedom and deeds exhibits Christian liberty.
Responsibilities and liberty nourishes the heart.]



