Man and Sin by Piet Schoonenberg (1964) 2.3 NA
[So what happens when, in the Modern opposition, “freedom” is defined as lack of responsibility?
Do less responsibilities mean more freedom?]
07/5/18
Category Archives: Defining Religion
06/12/18
Man and Sin by Piet Schoonenberg (1964) 2.3 MK
[How does this resonate with Schoonenberg’s claim that we have the freedom to serve God or Satan?
Freedom goes with both the potential of the person1a plus an actuality, the something contextualized by the thought experiment2a.
The thought experiment3a reflects illumination by social elites (or, in general, the Zeitgeist).]
06/8/18
Man and Sin by Piet Schoonenberg (1964) 2.3 MI
Summary of text [comment] page 83
[Both the ancient Jewish and modern American infra(sovereign) religions possessed objects that bring all subjects into organization.
Both were and are committed to creating the thought experiement3a or a mirror of the world3a.]
06/6/18
Man and Sin by Piet Schoonenberg (1964) 2.3 MG
Summary of text [comment] page 83
[My own inadequacy in understanding how to fulfill God’s laws2a was the ‘something2a’ that held first century common-folk Jews in bondage.
Paul, on the other hand, originally felt that he counted among the elites.
He knew how to fulfill God’s laws:
Persecute the followers of Jesus.]
06/1/18
Man and Sin by Piet Schoonenberg (1964) 2.3 MD
[All systems can be scammed.
All sovereigns are prey for competing infrasovereign religions.
All sovereigns strive to contextualize themselves.
They do so through forced conversion of the ruled populations.
Big Government Liberalism is a state religion composed of an alliance of infrasovereign religions.]
05/31/18
Man and Sin by Piet Schoonenberg (1964) 2.3 MC
Summary of text [comment] page 83
[Universal democracy leads to tyranny.
The Progressives, correspondingly, want universal democracy.]
05/30/18
Man and Sin by Piet Schoonenberg (1964) 2.3 MB
[The Cult of American Progressivism spews a deluge of words in order to maintain bondage to our particular victimhoods.
Pneumo-pathological mechanisms establish of a sovereign religion.
Those grasping for power have objects that bring subjects into organization.
Thinkpro-object enslaves the subjects who, like all those who went to Jesus and heard only parables, simply do not know any better.]
05/24/18
Man and Sin by Piet Schoonenberg (1964) 2.3 LY
[All political resistance is accused of hating the victims.
The political party of the Progressive elites longs to make the accusation.
The political party of the common folk longs to avoid the accusation.]
05/23/18
Man and Sin by Piet Schoonenberg (1964) 2.3 LX
[Progressive elites buy votes with various pro-objects.
These pro-objects nominally protect the victims.
In fact, these purported victims depend on largess from the Central Government. Indulgences validate the recipient’s victimhood. The recipient’s victimhood validates Progressive organizational objects.
The common word for “indulgence” is “entitlement”.]
05/22/18
Man and Sin by Piet Schoonenberg (1964) 2.3 LW
[Some American citizens sell their votes to the (infra)sovereign religion or, even more mind boggling, are convinced that the (infra)sovereign religions are on their side.
These are the so-called ‘low information voters’ who vote along tribal affiliation, as if, through elections, one tribe can legitimately subjugate the opposing tribes.
Forget the 10 commandments!]