Summary of text [comment] page 14

[When the “light” is taken as “the object that think^group has, but its detractors cannot possibly have”, then two parties are present: think^{group_is_light} and think^{enemy_is_darkness}.  The former projects the latter.

The exclusion of (the projected) think^{enemy_is_darkness} by think^{group_is_light} creates an atmosphere where think^{group_is_light} illuminates all aspects of the symbolic order of the time (Germans call it “the Zeitgeist”).

Articulation of think^divine is perceived as resistance; that is, criticism of think^{group_is_light}.  Think^light is confounded with think^{enemy_is_darkness}.

There is no escape, until the entire symbolic order (that is, the social construction of society) collapses due to its own consequences (law^essential), consequences that the think^{group_is_light} have long denied (law^denial).]