0069 Let me go to grace as thirdness and nature as firstness.
Here is a picture of the judgment.

0070 As before, the relation is imbued with secondness, so this term will enter actuality2 for the following category-based nested form.

0071 Now I wonder, “What is an actuality2 that coheres to the normal context3 (of grace) while standing distinct and separate from its potential1 (of nature)?”
If I choose the actuality2 of redemption2, then I can be assured of the possibility ‘that nature is excluded’1, in the normal context of grace3.
Redemption2 does not have much to do when it comes to nature1, in the same way that protocols2 do not have much to do with grace1.
0072 The abduction does not stop there, because redemption2, as an actuality, engenders a nested form on the adjacent lower level. Redemption2 seems to situate the normal context of salvation3 bringing the actuality of a personal relationship with God2 into relation with the potential of the church1.

At the moment, I am uncertain whether the two levels correspond to situation and content or to perspective and situation. Let me continue.
0073 With this pairing of category-based nested forms in tow, I wonder about the possibility of ‘excluding nature’1. Is this potential compatible with the potential of the ‘church’? Oh, I can think of a better term than “excluding nature”. How about the word, “creation”?
Ah, if “creation” is the perspective-level potential1c, then “creation1c” contextualizes both the Bible2a and theological formulations of my personal relationship with God2b.
There is the resulting interscope.

0074 On a perspective level, the normal context of grace3c brings the actuality of redemption2c into relation with the possibility of ‘creation’1c.
On the situation level, the normal context of salvation3b brings the actuality of a personal relationship with God2b into relation with the potential of ‘the church’1b. Theologians and pastors are crucial in manifesting the situation-level normal context3b and potential1b.
On the content level, the normal context of the logos3a brings the actuality of the Bible2a into relation with the possibility of ‘revelation’1a.