Thoughts on Whatever Became of Sin? By Karl Menninger MD (1973) 8P

Menninger went on to the “sins of anger, violence and aggression”.

On the horizontal axis of lawessential(sin(disposition)), the dispositions are “the psychologies of rage and resentment”.   The sin itself is often manifested as rudeness.  The lawessential includes both a judicial system of plea-bargaining & mandatory prison time as well as a community of damaged opportunistic individuals.

When “sin” is replaced by “political incorrectness”, then lawessential condones acts of rudeness, violence and aggression against individuals deemed “incorrect”.

On the vertical axis of thinkgroup(sin(consciencelacking)), Menninger mentioned that rudeness, violence and aggression are made possible by attitudes of ingratitude, inconsiderateness, and lack of self-control.  He also noted the alternate to thinkgroup was the thinkdivine of gratefulness and good manners.

Since Menninger was unaware that he stood for both Progressives and Christians, he was not in a position to see how Progressive thinkgroup contrasted with Christian thinkdivine.  Consistent with prior blogs, Progressive thinkgroup tells the believer what she wants to hear: Rudeness, violence and aggression express righteous anger, not bad manners.

Cryptotheological formulae explain the righteousness.