[What does it mean for sovereign power to impose an object that brings the subject into organization.

The imposition forcibly reduces both the responsibilities and the freedoms of the subject.

What does the subject gain from this exchange?

Some would argue that everyone (the collective) gains by the good inherent in the object (such as a reduction in health care costs, greater health benefits, and so on, all deriving from the cessation of cigarette smoking).

That argument, however, merely re-asserts the intention of the pro-object. It ignores the subjective impact on the individual.]