Summary of text [comment] page 83

[How would true conversion work in this example?

The health claims in the mirror of the world_3H are rational. They contrast with what I desire_1H. Yet, they adhere to my choice_2V, because value_1V is rational. As a result, I can envision my not smoking_3V addressing a potential value_1V, even though my habit_2H continues to light up.

My choice_2V to light up may come from the potential of something itself. I may value a ritual halt to negative thought sequences_1V.

Lighting up originally connected to a potential inherent in me_1a (in the interscoping form) and still does, but not so exclusively.

I am becoming more reasonable_1V.]