Summary of text [comment] page 82
Schoonenberg reiterated the point.
In Church doctrine, concupiscence is a sequel to Original Sin.
This statement reflects a dualism in Greek philosophy. Concupiscence implies ‘the flesh as opposed to reason’. Since concupiscence is not subject to reason, it is regarded as bad.
This raises a question:
Can reason participate in concupiscence? Does concupiscence include reason?