[If this is the mythos, then what is the logos?
What is the reference to be constructed on ‘the miracle of Paul’s insightful use of words ‘flesh’ and ‘spirit’?
If the word ‘flesh’ veils the history of ‘flesh and bones’, then a discussion of concupiscence does not follow, as it does here, in Schoonenberg’s book.
Instead, a discussion of the nested form self-justification3( concupiscence2(1)) might better apply. A similar discussion appears in my blogs on Ted Peter’s book Radical Evil.
But even that is not enough. Here an even bigger question:
What does it mean to live in a world where the meanings of words can reconfigure like a flock of birds as the seasons change?]