Summary of text [comment] page 72
Sin renders of us unable to love God and unable to love our fellow “man”.
If the person proclaims “his” love, it is not real.
One cannot appeal to the so-called fact, that some sinners (people who have lost grace) may nevertheless really love.
[Here, ‘love’ should be called agape as opposed to eros.
The above summary appears to confound the two.
Can a person incapable of agape fall into eros?
Here is a question that post-religious (enlightenment) rhetoricians would love to exploit. So let me pass it by.
According to Schoonenberg, natural agape cannot be real agape.
‘Agape is real’ when one’s conscience is oriented towards God.]