Summary of text [comment] pages 68 and 69

[At this point, I would like to compare the two recent images of the blog.

The first image is ‘self-esteem and spontaneous order’ (2.1 CY). The second image is ‘an interscoping form for loneliness, frustration and grievance’ (2.1 DB).

The situation and content levels of the interscoping forms (2.1 DB) in the prior blog appear curiously similar to the dyad of triadic relations in the limiting object^relation (2.1 CY).

‘I, seat of choice_3b,’ seems to parallel ‘regression and social justice as source of relation₃’.

‘The fact that my choice has already been determined by my circumstances_2b’ parallels ‘the design of social injustice and the structures that give advantage to that design₂’.

‘The potential of the object^organization to be the something that situates me_1b’ parallels ‘the potential of economic and political power₁’.

‘The limiting normal context that brings I recognize myself into actuality_3a’ parallels ‘deprivation as an immanent relation₃’.

‘The something that I recognize as myself _2a’ parallels ‘the dyad of the spontaneous order that calls itself into existence in the presence of an attractor and me knowing my place within that transient order₂’.

‘The potential of me that wells up in response to the limiting normal context_1a’ parallels ‘the potential of conditions to define self-esteem₁’.