Man and Sin by Piet Schoonenberg (1964) 2.3 BZ-3
In Exodus 20:6, God punishes the iniquity produced by the idolatry of the parents.
When does God do this?
He does it in the third and fourth generations.]
05/22/17
Category Archives: mythos & logos
05/19/17
Man and Sin by Piet Schoonenberg (1964) 2.3 BZ-2
[I now interweave the complementary strands. My sociological theory matches the second commandment in the following scenario:
The first generation synthesizes the symbolic order. Certain oppositions become real for them. They discover the idols.
The second generation assumes the actuality of this language (symbolic order). They sense the idols. They sensibly serve the idols. Benefits outweigh the costs. The second generation builds the temple.
The third generation tries to gain the benefits and avoid the costs of the system that their parents believe in. They see the system as inevitable. Most try to fit in. Some try to manipulate the idols. Some try to game the system. In doing so, they alter portions of the symbolic order of language in order to advance their organizational goals. Some oppositions are stressed, more than others.
Great idolatrous temples are difficult to maintain. Most realize that the temple is way too expensive. The costs are oppressive. Plus, the temple elites never are satisfied. But the temple is nice, really nice, even when it leaks when it rains.
The fourth generation confronts the costs. They break apart into those who insist that the system continue to expand (thinkpro-temple) and those who are ground into the dust (accused of thinkanti-object).
Society breaks. Many go insane. Many abandon the temple. The original opposition that founded the symbolic order comes undone. The idols are no longer are effective.]
05/18/17
Man and Sin by Piet Schoonenberg (1964) 2.3 BZ-1
[In Exodus 20:6, God punishes the iniquity produced by the idolatry of the parents.
When does God do this?
He does it in the third and fourth generations.]
05/17/17
Man and Sin by Piet Schoonenberg (1964) 2.3 BY
[Then, something goes wrong. Constructed society is flawed. The reigning symbolic order cannot tell why.
The symbolic order adjusts to discrepancies between what people have built (and invested in) and its consequences due to violations of lawessential. The elites always have explanations for unintended consequences. As golden calves, they also have the scapegoats to blame.
However, these expressions of lawdenial alter the language. The elites transform the meaning of words in order to suit their personal and institutional needs.
The zipper is transformed piecemeal. Some sections remain original. Other sections are adapted to interlace with new or altered material.
As the discrepancies multiply within the symbolic order, they pressure all the other oppositions (that had originally fell into line). Words that seemed to be distinct suddenly develop similarities. Some oppositions appear to no longer hold.
When the grounding opposition fails, a crisis of legitimation ensues.]
05/16/17
Man and Sin by Piet Schoonenberg (1964) 2.3 BX
Summary of text [comment] page 82
[Why do the elites destroy themselves from their own iniquity in the third and fourth generations?
I now add a complementary insight.
Language is a system of differences.
How do these differences form?
Consider the metaphor of a zipper. A symbolic order initially forms on the basis of one opposition. This opposition serves as a focus, so that other oppositions fall into line.
Once the symbolic order zips, people assume that what they are saying is referential (rather than socially constructed). The symbolic order becomes the basis of practical knowledge. People sensibly build society on the basis of the meanings, presences and messages of the symbolic order.]
05/11/17
Man and Sin by Piet Schoonenberg (1964) 2.3 BU
Summary of text [comment] page 82
[The first century after Christ was a period of re-ordination. The flock of words changed birds. The flock changed the way it gathered together. Words slipped from traditional moorings. ‘Flesh’ no longer contrasted with ‘blood & bones’. ‘Flesh’ no longer contrasted with ‘reason’. Both pairs were in contrast to ‘spirit’.
What does that imply?
Both ‘flesh and bones’ and ‘flesh and reason’ could be corrupted by thinkpro-object.]
05/10/17
Man and Sin by Piet Schoonenberg (1964) 2.3 BT
Summary of text [comment] page 82
[In 7816 U0′, I look at that moment in history and see a mythos, a change in the ordination of a symbolic order, and I try to figure out the logos.
I am familiar with this mythos because we are experiencing the same events in our present day. Just turn on the television and watch the propaganda. Televisionaries talk in a particular fashion, spinning the traditional meanings of words to the advantage of their (infra)sovereign religions.
What is revealed in the re-ordination of the flock of words that constitutes language?]