{"id":9948,"date":"2025-12-03T20:00:00","date_gmt":"2025-12-03T20:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.raziemah.com\/blog\/?p=9948"},"modified":"2025-10-09T15:42:07","modified_gmt":"2025-10-09T15:42:07","slug":"looking-at-igor-pilshchikov-and-mikhail-trunins-article-2016-the-tartu-moscow-school-of-semiotics-part-24-of-27","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.raziemah.com\/blog\/?p=9948","title":{"rendered":"Looking at Igor Pilshchikov and Mikhail Trunin’s Article (2016) “The Tartu-Moscow School of Semiotics” (Part 24 of 27)"},"content":{"rendered":"\n

0306 Now, I proceed to the derivative interscope.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"\"<\/a><\/figure>\n\n\n\n

0307 The content level<\/em> deals with semasiological issues<\/em>.  Given the words of a literary text2af<\/sub>, how do we discuss2am<\/sub>these words2af<\/sub> by way of meaning1a<\/sub>?<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Or should I ask, “Given a signifier2af<\/sub>, then what is the proper signification2am<\/sub>?”<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The literary text as semiological structuralist form2af<\/sub> [presents signifiers that entangle] positivist language as matter2am<\/sub>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Given a positivist language as matter2am<\/sub>,<\/em> then what corresponds to its meaning1a<\/sub>?<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

0308 Does the correspondence reflect the nature of explicit abstraction?<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Does the model-regarded parole2af<\/sub><\/em> of the literary text2af<\/sub><\/em> entangle a language2am<\/sub>,<\/em> displaying the attributes of a langue2am<\/sub> emerging from (and situating) the possibility of ‘positivist meaning’1a<\/sub>?<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Given the parole2af<\/sub> of a literary text2af<\/sub>, <\/em>what does the entangled language2am<\/sub> corresponding to langue2am<\/sub><\/em> suggest by way of meaning1a<\/sub>?<\/p>\n\n\n\n

0309 What type of confounding is this?<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"\"<\/a><\/figure>\n\n\n\n

The single form is in red.  The originating matter is language2bm<\/sub> (fundament).  The entangled matter is language2am<\/sub>(derivative).<\/p>\n\n\n\n

0310 The onamasiological question<\/em> concerns whether there is a spoken parole<\/em> corresponding to a particular (and perhaps, yet to be fully articulated) positivist langue<\/em>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

When applied to the situation-level of the derivative interscope, the onamasiological question transforms into a cultural query, asking “Is there a presence1b<\/sub><\/em> to attach to the meaning1a<\/sub><\/em> underlying the content-level positivist langauge2am<\/sub>?”<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

0311 Say what?<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Oh my.  I now proceed step by step.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

0312 Step one, the literary text2af<\/sub> (the SOi<\/sub> for the semiological2a<\/sub> structuralist2b<\/sub> model2c<\/sub> as SVi<\/sub>) entangles an explicit abstraction2am<\/sub><\/em> consisting of a label2am<\/sub> emerging from (and situating) a positivist3a<\/sub> meaning1a<\/sub><\/em>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In this entanglement, the fundament is confounded with the derivative.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

0313 In step two, I compare the two content-level actualities.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In the fundament interscope, langue2am<\/sub> (more or less actualizing a signified1a<\/sub>) [substantiates] parole2af<\/sub> (more or less serving as a signifier1a<\/sub>).<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In the derivative interscope, the literary text2af<\/sub>, that was originally substantiated by the language2bm<\/sub> of the mother tongue, now serves as the form2af<\/sub>  (perhaps, as a semiological2a<\/sub> structuralist2b<\/sub> model2c<\/sub> substituting for the literary text2bf<\/sub>) entangling an expert language2am<\/sub> that emerges from and situates the possibility of ‘positivist3a<\/sub> meaning’1a<\/sub>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

0314 This directly calls to mind the semasiological question,<\/em> “Given a spoken word2am<\/sub>, then what<\/em> is its meaning1a<\/sub>?”<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In other words, what <\/em>is the meaning1a<\/sub> (associated to signifier1a<\/sub>) of the explicit abstraction2am <\/sub>(associated to parole2af<\/sub>) in the derivative interscope?<\/p>\n\n\n\n

0315 For the fundament, definition is regarded as implicit for the originating language2bm<\/sub>, specified by a text’s {langue2am<\/sub> [substantiates] parole2af<\/sub>}.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

For the derivative, definition must be explicit, leading to the semasiological question.  An explicit abstraction2am<\/sub> (a label, parallel to parole2af<\/sub>) is entertained (or entangled).  However, the positivist meaning1a<\/sub>, which may serve as a metaphorical signifier1a<\/sub> for the explicit label2am<\/sub> resides in the domain of possibility1<\/sub>. An explicit abstraction2am<\/sub>emerges from (and situates) the potential of positivist meaning1a<\/sub> in the normal context of the TMS intellect3a<\/sub>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

0316 Step three, the derivative’s explicit abstraction2am<\/sub> manifests as a label2am<\/sub> arising (like a parole2af<\/sub>) from the potential of ‘positivist3a<\/sub> meaning’1a<\/sub> (serving as a metaphorical signifier1a<\/sub>).  The label2am<\/sub> (the fundament’s parole2af<\/sub>serves as a metaphor) emerges from a meaning1a<\/sub> (the fundament’s signifier1a<\/sub> serves as a metaphor) and its signified1a<\/sub>carries the potential of ‘exhibiting explicit positivist3a<\/sub> meaning’1a<\/sub> (and the fundament’s signified1a<\/sub> serves as a metaphor).<\/p>\n\n\n\n

0317 In short, the entangled language2am<\/sub> seems like parole2af<\/sub>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Plus, positivist meaning1a<\/sub> seems like a signifier1a<\/sub>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The language2am<\/sub> of the explicit abstraction2am<\/sub><\/em> (the metaphorical parole2af<\/sub>) appears to do justice to the TMS positivist intellect3a<\/sub> and the potential of ‘meaning’1a<\/sub> (the metaphorical signifier1a<\/sub>).<\/p>\n\n\n\n

How about a diagram of four elements of the derivative interscope?<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"\"<\/a><\/figure>\n\n\n\n

0318 So far, step three covers the content-level elements.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

0319 Once again, Saussure’s langue2am<\/sub><\/em> (for the fundament interscope) also serves as a metaphor for the literary text2af<\/sub><\/em>(for the derivative interscope).  The literary text2af<\/sub><\/em> (perhaps, now a semiological2a<\/sub> structuralist2b<\/sub> model2c<\/sub> substituting for the literary text2bf<\/sub>) is formally contextualized by the TMS positivist intellect3a<\/sub><\/em> and is alchemically enclosed in the scholar’s inquiry as a metaphorical langue1am<\/sub>, corresponding to the possibility of a ‘signified’1a<\/sub><\/em>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Saussure’s parole2af<\/sub><\/em> serves as a metaphor for the language2am<\/sub> that is entangled by the literary text2af<\/sub>.<\/em>  This metaphorical parole2am<\/sub><\/em> is both finally and efficiently related to the potential of a ‘positivist3a<\/sub> signifier’1a<\/sub>“<\/em> by way of definition3<\/sub>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Of course, this sounds a little goofy, since an explicit abstraction2am<\/sub><\/em> emerges from a metaphorical signifier1a<\/sub>,<\/em> and I am not sure what the corresponding ‘signified’1<\/sub> might be<\/em>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

0320 For the fundament interscope, I know that langue2am<\/sub> [substantiates] parole2af<\/sub>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

For the derivative interscope, I suspect that the literary text (semiological structuralist model)2af<\/sub> as metaphorical langue2am<\/sub><\/em> [now appears to substantiate] a language2am<\/sub> as a metaphorical parole2af<\/sub>, <\/em>offering an explicit label2am<\/sub>allowing a positivist signifier to constellate1a<\/sub><\/em>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Does that imply that the label2am<\/sub><\/em> (metaphorical parole2af<\/sub>, associated to signifier1a<\/sub>) precedes its meaning1a<\/sub><\/em>(metaphorical langue2am<\/sub>, associated to signified1a<\/sub>)?<\/p>\n\n\n\n

That is a very good question.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

0321 In step four, I ask, “If the explicit abstraction2am<\/sub> that labels a positivist meaning1a<\/sub> <\/em>constellates the potential of ‘a signifier’1a<\/sub>,<\/em> then what is the corresponding ‘signified1<\/sub>‘?”<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

It cannot be the literary text2af<\/sub>, because the literary text2af<\/sub> is the metaphorical langue2am<\/sub> that corresponds to… um… the interventional sign-object (SOi<\/sub>) of the structuralist3a<\/sub> semiological2a<\/sub> model2c<\/sub> (SVi<\/sub>).<\/p>\n\n\n\n

If that is the case, then the corresponding signified1<\/sub> may be something1b<\/sub> that acknowledges the presence of the entangled language2am<\/sub><\/em>.  Plus, it1b<\/sub> should show up on the situation level<\/em>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

0322 Ah, I have arrived at the situation level.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

If the onomasiological question<\/em> concerns whether there is a spoken parole2af<\/sub><\/em> corresponding to a particular langue2am<\/sub><\/em>, then how does the question apply to a situation where the presence of a signifier1a<\/sub>,<\/em> underlying an explicit abstraction2am<\/sub>, requires a corresponding situation-located signified1b<\/sub>?<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Given the presence1b<\/sub> of a metaphorical signifier1a<\/sub>,<\/em> then what technical term<\/em> might label that presence1b<\/sub> as a signified1b<\/sub>?<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Would such a signified1b<\/sub><\/em> support a referent2b<\/sub><\/em> as the situation-level actuality2b<\/sub> that virtually situates the entangled explicit abstraction2am<\/sub>?<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

0323 So maybe, the onamosiological question<\/em> may be reframed by the situation-level of the derivative interscope<\/em>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Does the presence1b<\/sub> of a label2am<\/sub> associated to the entangled language2am<\/sub> of positivist signifiers1a<\/sub> in the derivative interscope<\/em> serve as a signified1b<\/sub><\/em> that is situated by cognition2am<\/sub><\/em>, as a situation-level actuality2b<\/sub><\/em> in the normal context of cultural studies3b<\/sub>?<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

0324 Well, if that reframed question sounds plausible, then I can offer the following conclusions.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The fundament interscope<\/em> operates as an empirio-schematic description of what is going on in any particular literary text<\/em>.  What is going on when an author writes and a reader reads<\/em> entails implicit abstraction,<\/em> for the most part.  In other words, the writer<\/em> conveys a text and the reader<\/em> uses the same text in order to fill in the elements of a purely<\/em> relational structure associated with langue<\/em>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

This implicit process<\/em> is the subject matter for semiology3a<\/sub> and structuralism3b<\/sub><\/em>.  These two fields of inquiry<\/em> culminate ina judgment, actualized as a model2c<\/sub><\/em>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The derivative interscope<\/em> serves as a Positivist description of what is going on when writing and reading a particular literary text<\/em>.  This description uses explicit labels2am<\/sub>,<\/em> bearing the qualities of<\/em> a<\/em> metaphorical parole2af<\/sub><\/em> (that is, of a positivist signifier1a<\/sub><\/em>), that will be virtually situated by a cultural thing2b<\/sub>.<\/em>  In short, an explicit abstraction2am<\/sub> (SVs<\/sub>) broadly stands for a cultural thing2b<\/sub> (SOs<\/sub>) in regards to cultural studies3b<\/sub> operating on the potential of a signified1b<\/sub>(virtually situating a positivist signifier1a<\/sub>)’ (SIs<\/sub>).<\/p>\n\n\n\n

0325 Thus, the situation level of the derivative<\/em> wrestles with onomasiological issues<\/em> in a strange manner.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Given a signified1b<\/sub>,<\/em> then what is the name of the corresponding referent2b<\/sub>?<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Does cognition2bm<\/sub><\/em>, as a situation-level actuality2b<\/sub><\/em> in the normal context of cultural studies3b<\/sub>,<\/em> virtually situate the presence1b<\/sub> of a label2am<\/sub> associated to the entangled language2am<\/sub> of positivist signifiers1a<\/sub> in the derivative interscope?<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

0326 {Cognition as matter2bm<\/sub> [substantiates] social and cultural interaction as form2bf<\/sub>} situates the presence1b<\/sub> of positivist3a<\/sub> meaning1a<\/sub> in the normal context of cultural studies3b<\/sub>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

0327 May I further transform the onomasiological question and ask, “Is the situation-level actuality of cognition2bm<\/sub>and social interaction2bf <\/sub> the referent of an explicit abstraction2am<\/sub><\/em> (or label2am<\/sub>) that is entangled by a literary text2af<\/sub>?”<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

The answer is, “Yeah, just watch what people do after they read a particular text.”<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Do actions speak louder than words?<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Hmmm.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

0306 Now, I proceed to the derivative interscope. 0307 The content level deals with semasiological issues.  Given the words of a literary text2af, how do we discuss2amthese words2af by way of meaning1a? Or should I ask, “Given a signifier2af, then what is the proper signification2am?” The literary text as semiological structuralist form2af [presents signifiers that entangle] positivist language as matter2am. Given a […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[418],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-9948","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-article-review"],"yoast_head":"\nLooking at Igor Pilshchikov and Mikhail Trunin's Article (2016) "The Tartu-Moscow School of Semiotics" (Part 24 of 27) - An Archaeology of the Fall<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.raziemah.com\/blog\/?p=9948\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Looking at Igor Pilshchikov and Mikhail Trunin's Article (2016) "The Tartu-Moscow School of Semiotics" (Part 24 of 27) - An Archaeology of the Fall\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"0306 Now, I proceed to the derivative interscope. 0307 The content level deals with semasiological issues.  Given the words of a literary text2af, how do we discuss2amthese words2af by way of meaning1a? Or should I ask, “Given a signifier2af, then what is the proper signification2am?” The literary text as semiological structuralist form2af [presents signifiers that entangle] positivist language as matter2am. Given a […]\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.raziemah.com\/blog\/?p=9948\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"An Archaeology of the Fall\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2025-12-03T20:00:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.raziemah.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/Slide70.png\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"600\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"400\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/png\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"8 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.raziemah.com\/blog\/?p=9948#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.raziemah.com\/blog\/?p=9948\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.raziemah.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/ad695f570ebd1b2a6f85c4ac5badcd04\"},\"headline\":\"Looking at Igor Pilshchikov and Mikhail Trunin’s Article (2016) “The Tartu-Moscow School of Semiotics” (Part 24 of 27)\",\"datePublished\":\"2025-12-03T20:00:00+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.raziemah.com\/blog\/?p=9948\"},\"wordCount\":1760,\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.raziemah.com\/blog\/?p=9948#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.raziemah.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/Slide70.png\",\"articleSection\":[\"Article Review\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.raziemah.com\/blog\/?p=9948\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.raziemah.com\/blog\/?p=9948\",\"name\":\"Looking at Igor Pilshchikov and Mikhail Trunin's Article (2016) \\\"The Tartu-Moscow School of Semiotics\\\" (Part 24 of 27) - An Archaeology of the Fall\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.raziemah.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.raziemah.com\/blog\/?p=9948#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.raziemah.com\/blog\/?p=9948#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.raziemah.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/Slide70.png\",\"datePublished\":\"2025-12-03T20:00:00+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.raziemah.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/ad695f570ebd1b2a6f85c4ac5badcd04\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.raziemah.com\/blog\/?p=9948#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.raziemah.com\/blog\/?p=9948\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.raziemah.com\/blog\/?p=9948#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.raziemah.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/Slide70.png\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.raziemah.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/Slide70.png\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.raziemah.com\/blog\/?p=9948#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.raziemah.com\/blog\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Looking at Igor Pilshchikov and Mikhail Trunin’s Article (2016) “The Tartu-Moscow School of Semiotics” (Part 24 of 27)\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.raziemah.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.raziemah.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"An Archaeology of the Fall\",\"description\":\"A Horror Story by Razie Mah\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.raziemah.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.raziemah.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/ad695f570ebd1b2a6f85c4ac5badcd04\",\"name\":\"admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.raziemah.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/13f66383028a15bc9f1f6f30c43ce372a5a073cb8ec7f9069fa5158a183efe4d?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/13f66383028a15bc9f1f6f30c43ce372a5a073cb8ec7f9069fa5158a183efe4d?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"admin\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.raziemah.com\/blog\/?author=1\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Looking at Igor Pilshchikov and Mikhail Trunin's Article (2016) \"The Tartu-Moscow School of Semiotics\" (Part 24 of 27) - An Archaeology of the Fall","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.raziemah.com\/blog\/?p=9948","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Looking at Igor Pilshchikov and Mikhail Trunin's Article (2016) \"The Tartu-Moscow School of Semiotics\" (Part 24 of 27) - An Archaeology of the Fall","og_description":"0306 Now, I proceed to the derivative interscope. 0307 The content level deals with semasiological issues.  Given the words of a literary text2af, how do we discuss2amthese words2af by way of meaning1a? Or should I ask, “Given a signifier2af, then what is the proper signification2am?” The literary text as semiological structuralist form2af [presents signifiers that entangle] positivist language as matter2am. Given a […]","og_url":"https:\/\/www.raziemah.com\/blog\/?p=9948","og_site_name":"An Archaeology of the Fall","article_published_time":"2025-12-03T20:00:00+00:00","og_image":[{"width":600,"height":400,"url":"https:\/\/www.raziemah.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/Slide70.png","type":"image\/png"}],"author":"admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"admin","Est. reading time":"8 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.raziemah.com\/blog\/?p=9948#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.raziemah.com\/blog\/?p=9948"},"author":{"name":"admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.raziemah.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/ad695f570ebd1b2a6f85c4ac5badcd04"},"headline":"Looking at Igor Pilshchikov and Mikhail Trunin’s Article (2016) “The Tartu-Moscow School of Semiotics” (Part 24 of 27)","datePublished":"2025-12-03T20:00:00+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.raziemah.com\/blog\/?p=9948"},"wordCount":1760,"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.raziemah.com\/blog\/?p=9948#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.raziemah.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/Slide70.png","articleSection":["Article Review"],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.raziemah.com\/blog\/?p=9948","url":"https:\/\/www.raziemah.com\/blog\/?p=9948","name":"Looking at Igor Pilshchikov and Mikhail Trunin's Article (2016) \"The Tartu-Moscow School of Semiotics\" (Part 24 of 27) - An Archaeology of the Fall","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.raziemah.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.raziemah.com\/blog\/?p=9948#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.raziemah.com\/blog\/?p=9948#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.raziemah.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/Slide70.png","datePublished":"2025-12-03T20:00:00+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.raziemah.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/ad695f570ebd1b2a6f85c4ac5badcd04"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.raziemah.com\/blog\/?p=9948#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.raziemah.com\/blog\/?p=9948"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.raziemah.com\/blog\/?p=9948#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.raziemah.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/Slide70.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.raziemah.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/Slide70.png"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.raziemah.com\/blog\/?p=9948#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.raziemah.com\/blog"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Looking at Igor Pilshchikov and Mikhail Trunin’s Article (2016) “The Tartu-Moscow School of Semiotics” (Part 24 of 27)"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.raziemah.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.raziemah.com\/blog\/","name":"An Archaeology of the Fall","description":"A Horror Story by Razie Mah","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.raziemah.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.raziemah.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/ad695f570ebd1b2a6f85c4ac5badcd04","name":"admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.raziemah.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/13f66383028a15bc9f1f6f30c43ce372a5a073cb8ec7f9069fa5158a183efe4d?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/13f66383028a15bc9f1f6f30c43ce372a5a073cb8ec7f9069fa5158a183efe4d?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"admin"},"url":"https:\/\/www.raziemah.com\/blog\/?author=1"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.raziemah.com\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/9948","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.raziemah.com\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.raziemah.com\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.raziemah.com\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.raziemah.com\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=9948"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.raziemah.com\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/9948\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":9952,"href":"https:\/\/www.raziemah.com\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/9948\/revisions\/9952"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.raziemah.com\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=9948"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.raziemah.com\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=9948"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.raziemah.com\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=9948"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}