{"id":9874,"date":"2025-12-20T08:00:00","date_gmt":"2025-12-20T08:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.raziemah.com\/blog\/?p=9874"},"modified":"2025-10-09T15:01:34","modified_gmt":"2025-10-09T15:01:34","slug":"looking-at-igor-pilshchikov-and-mikhail-trunins-article-2016-the-tartu-moscow-school-of-semiotics-part-9-of-27","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.raziemah.com\/blog\/?p=9874","title":{"rendered":"Looking at Igor Pilshchikov and Mikhail Trunin&#8217;s Article (2016) &#8220;The Tartu-Moscow School of Semiotics&#8221; (Part 9 of 27)"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p>0110 Now back to Peirce and Aristotle and the confounding at hand.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>To start,&nbsp;<em>the empirio-schematic judgment<sub>2p<\/sub><\/em>&nbsp;is&nbsp;<em>the actuality<sub>2p<\/sub>&nbsp;in the nested form produced when the Positivist&#8217;s judgment unfolds<\/em>.&nbsp;&nbsp;The empirio-schematic judgment<sub>2p<\/sub>&nbsp;then unfolds into a perspective-level nested form (with subscripts &#8220;e&#8221;, for now, then &#8220;c&#8221; for perspective level).<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><em>The structuralist model<sub>2e<\/sub><\/em>&nbsp;serves as&nbsp;<em>an actuality<sub>2e<\/sub>,&nbsp;<\/em>within<em>&nbsp;the unfolded empirio-schematic judgment<sub>2e<\/sub><\/em>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Then,&nbsp;<em>the structuralist model<sub>2e<\/sub><\/em>&nbsp;virtually contextualizes&nbsp;<em>an actuality<sub>2(2e)<\/sub>,<\/em>&nbsp;consisting of the dyad, {language as matter [substantiates] a literary text as form}<sub>2(2e)<\/sub>&nbsp;(constituting a situation level, the subscript will soon be &#8220;2b&#8221;).<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>0111 Do these statements describe&nbsp;<em>the empirio-schematic judgment on the left in the following figure,&nbsp;<\/em>corresponding to&nbsp;<em>what ought to be<\/em>&nbsp;(secondness) for the Positivist&#8217;s judgment?<\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-full\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.raziemah.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/Slide28.png\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"600\" height=\"400\" src=\"https:\/\/www.raziemah.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/Slide28.png\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-9875\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.raziemah.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/Slide28.png 600w, https:\/\/www.raziemah.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/Slide28-300x200.png 300w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 600px) 100vw, 600px\" \/><\/a><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p>0112 According to the triumphalist scientist,&nbsp;<em>models<sub>2<\/sub>&nbsp;of the literary text as form<sub>2e(2p<\/sub><\/em><sub>)<\/sub>&nbsp;should occupy the slot for&nbsp;<em>the noumenon<sub>1p<\/sub>, the literary text itself<\/em>.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;When that happens, then&nbsp;<em>the noumenon-occupying model<sub>1p<\/sub><\/em>&nbsp;[can be objectified as]&nbsp;<em>its literary phenomena<\/em>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>That is one aspect to the substitution.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>0113 Another aspect is that&nbsp;<em>the perspective-level model<sub>2e(2p)<\/sub><\/em>&nbsp;contextualizes&nbsp;<em>the situation-level literary text as form<sub>2(2e)<\/sub><\/em>.&nbsp;&nbsp;<em>This situation-level form<sub>2bf<\/sub><\/em>&nbsp;enters into&nbsp;<em>the noumenon<sub>1p<\/sub>,<\/em>&nbsp;via&nbsp;<em>the model<sub>2e(2p)<\/sub>,<\/em>&nbsp;as anticipated by triumphalist scientists, and entangles&nbsp;<em>matters<sub>2pm<\/sub><\/em>&nbsp;salient to&nbsp;<em>a not-religious intellect<sub>3p<\/sub><\/em>&nbsp;operating on&nbsp;<em>the potential of the literary text as noumenon<sub>1p<\/sub>&nbsp;[and] its corresponding literary phenomena<sub>1p<\/sub>.<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>0114 How confounding is that?<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>When the model<sub>2e(2p)<\/sub>&nbsp;replaces (or overlays) the noumenon<sub>1a<\/sub>, it<sub>2e(2p)<\/sub>&nbsp;does not entangle literary phenomena<sub>1c<\/sub>.&nbsp;&nbsp;Rather, it<sub>2e(2p)<\/sub>&nbsp;entangles a language<sub>2am<\/sub>&nbsp;of positivist meaning<sub>1a<\/sub>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>It makes me wonder, what matters<sub>2pm<\/sub>&nbsp;are salient to a not-religious intellect<sub>3p<\/sub>&nbsp;operating on the potential of&#8230;&nbsp;<em>whatever inspires Kant&#8217;s slogan<sub>1p<\/sub><\/em>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Kant&#8217;s slogan?<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><em>A noumenon<\/em>&nbsp;cannot be fully objectified as&nbsp;<em>its phenomena<\/em>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>0115 Okay, if Kant&#8217;s slogan is relevant, then I wonder, &#8220;What does a noumenon have that its phenomena cannot objectify?&#8221;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>What&nbsp;<em>words<\/em>&nbsp;apply?<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>They cannot be&nbsp;<em>scientific terms<\/em>.&nbsp;&nbsp;They must be um&#8230;&nbsp;<em>phenomenological labels<\/em>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>0116 Well, what does&nbsp;<em>any phenomenologist<\/em>&nbsp;say that&nbsp;<em>any particular noumenon<\/em>&nbsp;must be?<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>To start, a noumenon has&nbsp;<em>a meaning<\/em>&nbsp;that cannot be reduced to its phenomena.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Then, a noumenon has&nbsp;<em>a presence<\/em>&nbsp;that cannot be fully objectified as its phenomena.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Also, a noumenon may offer&nbsp;<em>a message<\/em>&nbsp;that cannot be found in the observable and measurable aspects of&nbsp;<em>the thing itself<\/em>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>0117 As an exercise, replace the term &#8220;noumenon&#8221; with &#8220;the literary text as form&#8221;.&nbsp;&nbsp;Then, ask whether&nbsp;<em>the phenomenological approach<\/em>&nbsp;is sufficient.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Remember, phenomenology, Russian theory, structuralism and semiology develop in&nbsp;<em>a modernist and science-fixated Zeitgeist during the first half of the twenty-first century<\/em>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>0118 What does this imply?<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>If structure or system is the thing where&nbsp;<em>semiology as matter [substantiates] aesthetics as form,<\/em>&nbsp;and if&nbsp;<em>the structuralist thing<\/em>&nbsp;pertains to&nbsp;<em>the mother-tongue as matter,<\/em>&nbsp;and if {<em>the native language as matter<\/em>&nbsp;[substantiates]&nbsp;<em>a literary text as form<\/em>}, then&nbsp;<em>an entanglement<\/em>&nbsp;may occur.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><em>The literary text as form<\/em>&nbsp;can entangle&nbsp;<em>model-illuminated words as matter,<\/em>&nbsp;because&nbsp;<em>these words<\/em>&nbsp;reveal&nbsp;<em>the possibility of aesthetic meaning, presence and message<\/em>&nbsp;for&nbsp;<em>the literary text as form<\/em>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>0120 Here is a picture.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-full\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.raziemah.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/Slide29.png\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"600\" height=\"400\" src=\"https:\/\/www.raziemah.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/Slide29.png\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-9876\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.raziemah.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/Slide29.png 600w, https:\/\/www.raziemah.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/Slide29-300x200.png 300w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 600px) 100vw, 600px\" \/><\/a><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p>0121 I ask, &#8220;What does&nbsp;<em>this derivation<\/em>&nbsp;have to do&nbsp;<em>with the history of the semiotics of the Tartu-Moscow School of Semiotics?&#8221;<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>My answer is freaky.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>The members of the Tartu-Moscow School, in their transnational collaborations,&nbsp;<em>embody<\/em>&nbsp;the derivation rendered in this examination.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>0122 How do I know this?<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>0123 The collaborators are all interested in making academic inquiry into Slavic languages and literature more scientific, in accordance with the &#8220;Socialist&#8221; title of the USSR, and in accordance to their own expertise as linguists.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>This examiner has&nbsp;<em>a model of the scientific enterprise as a Positivist&#8217;s judgment<\/em>, not available to those who lived in the twentieth century.&nbsp;&nbsp;This model allows me to express their history in terms of later semiotic discoveries in the Peircean tradition.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>0124 The examiner does not subtract from&nbsp;<em>the achievements of the Tartu-Moscow School of Semiotics<\/em>.&nbsp;&nbsp;Rather,&nbsp;<em>the examination<\/em>&nbsp;shows&nbsp;<em>how cunning these researchers turn out to be<\/em>.&nbsp;&nbsp;They protect their own field of study from reductionists.&nbsp;&nbsp;They set on finding a path suitable to a not-religious intellect, in accordance with science.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>In the process, they unearth&nbsp;<em>concepts that are foundational to Slavic civilization<\/em>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>They make&nbsp;<em>archaeological discoveries<\/em>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>0125 The Positivist&#8217;s judgment contains two judgments.&nbsp;&nbsp;The Positivist judgment is a triadic relation that contains the empirio-schematic judgment as one of its elements.&nbsp;&nbsp;Without the empirio-schematic judgment, the Positivist&#8217;s judgment could not function.&nbsp;&nbsp;So, the empirio-schematic judgment is fundament.&nbsp;&nbsp;The Positivist&#8217;s judgement is derivative.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>0126 The confounding leads to a separation of the two judgments.&nbsp;&nbsp;The empirio-schematic judgment serves as the perspective-level of a fundament three-level interscope.&nbsp;&nbsp;The Positivist&#8217;s judgment serves as the content-level of a derivative three-level interscope.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>At the same time, the confounding binds the two interscopes.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>0127 Here is a picture.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-full\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.raziemah.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/Slide30.png\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"600\" height=\"400\" src=\"https:\/\/www.raziemah.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/Slide30.png\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-9877\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.raziemah.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/Slide30.png 600w, https:\/\/www.raziemah.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/Slide30-300x200.png 300w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 600px) 100vw, 600px\" \/><\/a><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p>0128&nbsp;<em>The semiological and structuralist literary thing<\/em>&nbsp;entangles&nbsp;<em>an aesthetic (yet not-religious) language of meaning, presence and message<\/em>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>One form,&nbsp;<em>the literary text,<\/em>&nbsp;stands in dyadic relation to two matters, one substantiating and one entangled.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>0129&nbsp;<em>The next task of this examiner<\/em>&nbsp;is to derive&nbsp;<em>the fundament and derivative interscopes<\/em>.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>0110 Now back to Peirce and Aristotle and the confounding at hand. To start,&nbsp;the empirio-schematic judgment2p&nbsp;is&nbsp;the actuality2p&nbsp;in the nested form produced when the Positivist&#8217;s judgment unfolds.&nbsp;&nbsp;The empirio-schematic judgment2p&nbsp;then unfolds into a perspective-level nested form (with subscripts &#8220;e&#8221;, for now, then &#8220;c&#8221; for perspective level). The structuralist model2e&nbsp;serves as&nbsp;an actuality2e,&nbsp;within&nbsp;the unfolded empirio-schematic judgment2e. Then,&nbsp;the structuralist model2e&nbsp;virtually [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[418],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-9874","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-article-review"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v26.9 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Looking at Igor Pilshchikov and Mikhail Trunin&#039;s Article (2016) &quot;The Tartu-Moscow School of Semiotics&quot; (Part 9 of 27) - An Archaeology of the Fall<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.raziemah.com\/blog\/?p=9874\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Looking at Igor Pilshchikov and Mikhail Trunin&#039;s Article (2016) &quot;The Tartu-Moscow School of Semiotics&quot; (Part 9 of 27) - An Archaeology of the Fall\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"0110 Now back to Peirce and Aristotle and the confounding at hand. To start,&nbsp;the empirio-schematic judgment2p&nbsp;is&nbsp;the actuality2p&nbsp;in the nested form produced when the Positivist&#8217;s judgment unfolds.&nbsp;&nbsp;The empirio-schematic judgment2p&nbsp;then unfolds into a perspective-level nested form (with subscripts &#8220;e&#8221;, for now, then &#8220;c&#8221; for perspective level). The structuralist model2e&nbsp;serves as&nbsp;an actuality2e,&nbsp;within&nbsp;the unfolded empirio-schematic judgment2e. Then,&nbsp;the structuralist model2e&nbsp;virtually [&hellip;]\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.raziemah.com\/blog\/?p=9874\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"An Archaeology of the Fall\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2025-12-20T08:00:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.raziemah.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/Slide28.png\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"600\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"400\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/png\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.raziemah.com\/blog\/?p=9874#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.raziemah.com\/blog\/?p=9874\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.raziemah.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/ad695f570ebd1b2a6f85c4ac5badcd04\"},\"headline\":\"Looking at Igor Pilshchikov and Mikhail Trunin&#8217;s Article (2016) &#8220;The Tartu-Moscow School of Semiotics&#8221; (Part 9 of 27)\",\"datePublished\":\"2025-12-20T08:00:00+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.raziemah.com\/blog\/?p=9874\"},\"wordCount\":1006,\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.raziemah.com\/blog\/?p=9874#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.raziemah.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/Slide28.png\",\"articleSection\":[\"Article Review\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.raziemah.com\/blog\/?p=9874\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.raziemah.com\/blog\/?p=9874\",\"name\":\"Looking at Igor Pilshchikov and Mikhail Trunin's Article (2016) \\\"The Tartu-Moscow School of Semiotics\\\" (Part 9 of 27) - An Archaeology of the Fall\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.raziemah.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.raziemah.com\/blog\/?p=9874#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.raziemah.com\/blog\/?p=9874#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.raziemah.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/Slide28.png\",\"datePublished\":\"2025-12-20T08:00:00+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.raziemah.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/ad695f570ebd1b2a6f85c4ac5badcd04\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.raziemah.com\/blog\/?p=9874#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.raziemah.com\/blog\/?p=9874\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.raziemah.com\/blog\/?p=9874#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.raziemah.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/Slide28.png\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.raziemah.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/Slide28.png\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.raziemah.com\/blog\/?p=9874#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.raziemah.com\/blog\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Looking at Igor Pilshchikov and Mikhail Trunin&#8217;s Article (2016) &#8220;The Tartu-Moscow School of Semiotics&#8221; (Part 9 of 27)\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.raziemah.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.raziemah.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"An Archaeology of the Fall\",\"description\":\"A Horror Story by Razie Mah\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.raziemah.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.raziemah.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/ad695f570ebd1b2a6f85c4ac5badcd04\",\"name\":\"admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.raziemah.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/13f66383028a15bc9f1f6f30c43ce372a5a073cb8ec7f9069fa5158a183efe4d?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/13f66383028a15bc9f1f6f30c43ce372a5a073cb8ec7f9069fa5158a183efe4d?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"admin\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.raziemah.com\/blog\/?author=1\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Looking at Igor Pilshchikov and Mikhail Trunin's Article (2016) \"The Tartu-Moscow School of Semiotics\" (Part 9 of 27) - An Archaeology of the Fall","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.raziemah.com\/blog\/?p=9874","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Looking at Igor Pilshchikov and Mikhail Trunin's Article (2016) \"The Tartu-Moscow School of Semiotics\" (Part 9 of 27) - An Archaeology of the Fall","og_description":"0110 Now back to Peirce and Aristotle and the confounding at hand. To start,&nbsp;the empirio-schematic judgment2p&nbsp;is&nbsp;the actuality2p&nbsp;in the nested form produced when the Positivist&#8217;s judgment unfolds.&nbsp;&nbsp;The empirio-schematic judgment2p&nbsp;then unfolds into a perspective-level nested form (with subscripts &#8220;e&#8221;, for now, then &#8220;c&#8221; for perspective level). The structuralist model2e&nbsp;serves as&nbsp;an actuality2e,&nbsp;within&nbsp;the unfolded empirio-schematic judgment2e. Then,&nbsp;the structuralist model2e&nbsp;virtually [&hellip;]","og_url":"https:\/\/www.raziemah.com\/blog\/?p=9874","og_site_name":"An Archaeology of the Fall","article_published_time":"2025-12-20T08:00:00+00:00","og_image":[{"width":600,"height":400,"url":"https:\/\/www.raziemah.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/Slide28.png","type":"image\/png"}],"author":"admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"admin","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.raziemah.com\/blog\/?p=9874#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.raziemah.com\/blog\/?p=9874"},"author":{"name":"admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.raziemah.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/ad695f570ebd1b2a6f85c4ac5badcd04"},"headline":"Looking at Igor Pilshchikov and Mikhail Trunin&#8217;s Article (2016) &#8220;The Tartu-Moscow School of Semiotics&#8221; (Part 9 of 27)","datePublished":"2025-12-20T08:00:00+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.raziemah.com\/blog\/?p=9874"},"wordCount":1006,"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.raziemah.com\/blog\/?p=9874#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.raziemah.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/Slide28.png","articleSection":["Article Review"],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.raziemah.com\/blog\/?p=9874","url":"https:\/\/www.raziemah.com\/blog\/?p=9874","name":"Looking at Igor Pilshchikov and Mikhail Trunin's Article (2016) \"The Tartu-Moscow School of Semiotics\" (Part 9 of 27) - An Archaeology of the Fall","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.raziemah.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.raziemah.com\/blog\/?p=9874#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.raziemah.com\/blog\/?p=9874#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.raziemah.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/Slide28.png","datePublished":"2025-12-20T08:00:00+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.raziemah.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/ad695f570ebd1b2a6f85c4ac5badcd04"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.raziemah.com\/blog\/?p=9874#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.raziemah.com\/blog\/?p=9874"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.raziemah.com\/blog\/?p=9874#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.raziemah.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/Slide28.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.raziemah.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/Slide28.png"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.raziemah.com\/blog\/?p=9874#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.raziemah.com\/blog"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Looking at Igor Pilshchikov and Mikhail Trunin&#8217;s Article (2016) &#8220;The Tartu-Moscow School of Semiotics&#8221; (Part 9 of 27)"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.raziemah.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.raziemah.com\/blog\/","name":"An Archaeology of the Fall","description":"A Horror Story by Razie Mah","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.raziemah.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.raziemah.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/ad695f570ebd1b2a6f85c4ac5badcd04","name":"admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.raziemah.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/13f66383028a15bc9f1f6f30c43ce372a5a073cb8ec7f9069fa5158a183efe4d?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/13f66383028a15bc9f1f6f30c43ce372a5a073cb8ec7f9069fa5158a183efe4d?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"admin"},"url":"https:\/\/www.raziemah.com\/blog\/?author=1"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.raziemah.com\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/9874","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.raziemah.com\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.raziemah.com\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.raziemah.com\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.raziemah.com\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=9874"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.raziemah.com\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/9874\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":9878,"href":"https:\/\/www.raziemah.com\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/9874\/revisions\/9878"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.raziemah.com\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=9874"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.raziemah.com\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=9874"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.raziemah.com\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=9874"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}