[Hypocrisy follows a roundabout pathway to denial.<\/p>\n
The hypocrite engages in transgressions.\u00a0 These transgressions can be described on the moral religious axis as thinkgroup<\/sup>3<\/sub>(sin2<\/sub>(consciencelacking<\/sup>1<\/sub>)).\u00a0 The hypocritice does not proselytize ‘his’ thinkgroup<\/sup>.<\/p>\n Why?<\/p>\n ‘His’ thinkgroup<\/sup> is parasitic to a sovereign that thinkdivine<\/sup> has empowered.\u00a0 The hypocrite does not pay the price for \u2018his\u2019 actions and directs resources to \u2018himself\u2019.]<\/p>\n As the consequences of the transgressions (of hypocrites) become more and more apparent, the sovereign may face a choice.\u00a0 The sovereign may recognize that the hypocrites saps \u2018his\u2019 ability to maintain sovereign functions or \u2018he\u2019 may fail to recognize what is happening.\u00a0 Either way, members of a parasitic thinkgroup<\/sup> will insist that they are not responsible.<\/p>\n Moreover, they will insist that the cause of the problems cannot be understood as lawessential<\/sup>3<\/sub>(transgressions2<\/sub>(dispositions1<\/sub>)). Thus, the denial of lawessential<\/sup> underlies hypocrisy.]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" [Hypocrisy follows a roundabout pathway to denial. The hypocrite engages in transgressions.\u00a0 These transgressions can be described on the moral religious axis as thinkgroup3(sin2(consciencelacking1)).\u00a0 The hypocritice does not proselytize ‘his’ thinkgroup. Why? ‘His’ thinkgroup is parasitic to a sovereign that thinkdivine has empowered.\u00a0 The hypocrite does not pay the price for \u2018his\u2019 actions and directs […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[6],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-977","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-the-science-of-original-sin"],"yoast_head":"\n