{"id":9720,"date":"2025-10-14T08:00:00","date_gmt":"2025-10-14T08:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.raziemah.com\/blog\/?p=9720"},"modified":"2025-05-24T12:56:24","modified_gmt":"2025-05-24T12:56:24","slug":"a-first-look-at-julian-jayness-book-1976-the-origin-of-consciousness-in-the-breakdown-of-the-bicameral-mind-part-16-of-21","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.raziemah.com\/blog\/?p=9720","title":{"rendered":"A First Look at Julian Jaynes’s Book (1976) “The Origin of Consciousness in the Breakdown of the Bicameral Mind” (Part 16 of 21)"},"content":{"rendered":"\n

0448 But, isn’t the problem of Julian Jaynes’s hypothesis<\/em> the second item in the following list?<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"\"<\/a><\/figure>\n\n\n\n

0449 So far, this examination is undecided.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Yes, it is a terminological problem, because the double-brain<\/em> is also one of the proposals.  I know from this examination that the double-brain evolves as a two-chambered cognitive property of the human brain… er… mind<\/em>.  The bicameral mind<\/em> pumps interventional sign relations<\/em>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

No, the term, “auditory hallucination”, is a projection of modern sensibilities onto subject matter that… well… may be too disturbing to discuss<\/em>.  What if the casual dismissal of Jaynes’s four-strand thesis<\/em> could be played back, in the mind of a modern objector, in the voice of a well-regarded psychology professor.  You know the one that I am referring to<\/em>.  Just look at all the awards on display in the office.  What if…<\/p>\n\n\n\n

0450 I pause, while the reader shudders.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

…the hallucinated voice of the psychology professor<\/em> tells the modern objector what to say about the topic of “auditory hallucinations”?<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Of course, it is nonsense.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

0451 Now, let me walk through my bimodal answer<\/em>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

0452 My first step is to consider the scholastic interscope for how people think<\/em>.  The interventional sign-relation is embedded within this interscope.  This interscope, by the way, belongs to the human niche<\/em>.  This interscope is an actuality that is independent of the adapting species<\/em>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"\"<\/a><\/figure>\n\n\n\n

0453 On the perspective level, a normal context asking, “Does this make sense?”3c<\/sub>,<\/em> brings the actuality of the unfolding of judgment2c<\/sub><\/em> into relation with the possibility of ‘contextualizing the situation ‘1c<\/sub><\/em>.  “The situation” includes both phantasm2b<\/sub> (species expressa2b<\/sub><\/em>) and impression2a<\/sub> (species impressa2a<\/sub><\/em>).<\/p>\n\n\n\n

With sensible construction, the perspective-level comes into play only when something goes wrong.  Julian Jaynes’s description of the occasion of the auditory hallucinations2c(2a)<\/sub> of the bicameral mind<\/em> concurs.  In the Iliad,<\/em> visual and auditory hallucinations are (1) taken for granted as real and (2) received under stressful situations.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

0454 My designation for Jaynes’s “auditory hallucination”?<\/p>\n\n\n\n

 I designate the actualities within the interventional sign-relation<\/em>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Say what?<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Another way to label an auditory hallucination2c(2a)<\/sub> is SVi<\/sub>(SOi<\/sub>).<\/p>\n\n\n\n

0455 The SVi<\/sub> of commitment2c<\/sub> can be depicted as a category-based nested form<\/em>.  A ratio (rationes,<\/em> relation, thirdness) brings the intelligibility of perception (species expressa intelligibilis,<\/em> what ought to be, firstness) into relation with the universality of sensation (species impressa intelligibilis,<\/em> what is, secondness).<\/p>\n\n\n\n

0456 Since commitment2c<\/sub> (SVi<\/sub>) is a category-based nested form and the content-level of the scholastic interscope (SIi<\/sub>and SOi<\/sub>) is a category-based nested form, one initially anticipates resonances between the two nested forms.  These resonances are built into the interventional sign-relation<\/em> as a human adaptation.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"\"<\/a><\/figure>\n\n\n\n

0457 The first resonance is between ratio3(2c)<\/sub><\/em> (or balance3(2c)<\/sub>) and what is happening3a<\/sub><\/em>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The implication is that (as far as scholastics are concerned) everything that happens<\/em> has a reason.  A Christian theologian contends that the universe embodies the rationality of God<\/em>.  Modern science presumes that the universe is rational, but avers in regards to the theologian’s contention. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

0458 The second resonance is between the universality of sensation2(2c)<\/sub><\/em> and sensation(impression(decoding))2a<\/sub><\/em>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In Latin, the second resonance is between species impressa intelligibilis2(2c)<\/sub><\/em> and species impressa2a<\/sub><\/em>.  The plainness of the Latin<\/em> assists, because each of these terms must be regarded holistically.  In English, scientific terminology elaborates further distinctions and wholeness is veiled.  For example, for the perspective-level actuality2c<\/sub>, the Latin term, intelligibilis,<\/em> translates as “universality”.  Also, species impressa<\/em>2a<\/sub> is captured by three distinct terms: sensation, impression and decoding.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

0459 What else about the second resonance?<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The Christian theologian<\/em> contends that our senses are true.  Our senses are universal.  A universal applies to well… just about everything.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

To me, this contention comports with sensible construction.  Social construction produces impressions that do not necessary entail things that trigger external and internal senses.  Rather, social construction wrestles with grammatically correct, counter-intuitive statements<\/em> that are decoded into literal referents that do not make sense, and demand the construction of a cognitive space that accommodates the statements<\/em>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The scientist<\/em> practices the second resonance with every observation and measurement<\/em>.  If the universality of sensation<\/em>is not valid, then the observations and the measurements of one researcher should not be reproduced by another researcher.  Yet, the reproduction of experimental data by independent researchers<\/em> is a hallmark of science.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

0460 The third resonance is between the potential intelligibility of perception1(2c)<\/sub><\/em> and the possibility of ‘something happening’1a<\/sub><\/em>.  In Latin, the third resonance is between species expressa intelligibilis2(2c)<\/sub><\/em> and oops, there is no Latin term for the potential of ‘something happening’1a<\/sub><\/em>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

How about itshay appenshay?<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

But, what about intelligibility?<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Firstness exhibits the logic of inclusion.  Firstness allows contradictions.  So, even if ‘something happening’ is purely random, such as tarot cards in a well-shuffled deck, the cards that are drawn include the potential of an intelligible perception1(2c)<\/sub>,<\/em> according to the third resonance.  The task of a card-reader is to weave the lay of the cards2c<\/sub> into a phantasm2b<\/sub>, by decoding each card as a symbol in a symbolic order2a<\/sub>.  The cards speak for themselves.  The card-reader merely integrates the species impressae2a<\/sub><\/em> into a phantasm2b<\/sub> that is intelligible enough to address the client’s questions<\/em>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

0461 Christian theologians<\/em> may chuckle at the idea of the third resonance, between the potential intelligibility of perception1(2c)<\/sub><\/em> and the possibility of ‘something happening’1a<\/sub><\/em>.  But, I bet that every day those theologians pray for the insight to recognize the wisdom hidden within the craziness of everyday living<\/em>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

0462 Scientists<\/em> use the third resonance in order to appreciate how hypotheses are generated,<\/em> as opposed to how hypotheses are tested<\/em>.  Of course, every hypothesis must eventually be framed in a manner that allows observations, measurements, and modeling, based on specialized technical terminology.  Courses in “what is science” emphasize these aspects, because they increase the reputation that science enjoys.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

But, consider any modern scientific theory and imagine how a premodern scholastic could ideate its highly technical formulation.  To me, every day, the sun goes around the earth.  The continents are not floating on a sea of molten magma.  I don’t ever notice when a radioactive element decays.  The sun produces blinding light through a mechanism that involves things that nobody can see with their eyes.  I can go on, by why bother?<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Scientists presume that ‘something happening’1a <\/sub>has the potential to be intelligible1(2c)<\/sub> in ways that we would never even dream.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

0448 But, isn’t the problem of Julian Jaynes’s hypothesis the second item in the following list? 0449 So far, this examination is undecided. Yes, it is a terminological problem, because the double-brain is also one of the proposals.  I know from this examination that the double-brain evolves as a two-chambered cognitive property of the human brain… er… mind.  The bicameral mind pumps interventional sign […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[417],"tags":[573],"class_list":["post-9720","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-book-review","tag-bicameral-mind"],"yoast_head":"\nA First Look at Julian Jaynes's Book (1976) "The Origin of Consciousness in the Breakdown of the Bicameral Mind" (Part 16 of 21) - An Archaeology of the Fall<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.raziemah.com\/blog\/?p=9720\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"A First Look at Julian Jaynes's Book (1976) "The Origin of Consciousness in the Breakdown of the Bicameral Mind" (Part 16 of 21) - An Archaeology of the Fall\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"0448 But, isn’t the problem of Julian Jaynes’s hypothesis the second item in the following list? 0449 So far, this examination is undecided. Yes, it is a terminological problem, because the double-brain is also one of the proposals.  I know from this examination that the double-brain evolves as a two-chambered cognitive property of the human brain… er… mind.  The bicameral mind pumps interventional sign […]\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.raziemah.com\/blog\/?p=9720\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"An Archaeology of the Fall\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2025-10-14T08:00:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.raziemah.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/05\/Slide44-1.png\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"600\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"400\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/png\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"6 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.raziemah.com\/blog\/?p=9720#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.raziemah.com\/blog\/?p=9720\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.raziemah.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/ad695f570ebd1b2a6f85c4ac5badcd04\"},\"headline\":\"A First Look at Julian Jaynes’s Book (1976) “The Origin of Consciousness in the Breakdown of the Bicameral Mind” (Part 16 of 21)\",\"datePublished\":\"2025-10-14T08:00:00+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.raziemah.com\/blog\/?p=9720\"},\"wordCount\":1247,\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.raziemah.com\/blog\/?p=9720#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.raziemah.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/05\/Slide44-1.png\",\"keywords\":[\"bicameral mind\"],\"articleSection\":[\"Book Review\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.raziemah.com\/blog\/?p=9720\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.raziemah.com\/blog\/?p=9720\",\"name\":\"A First Look at Julian Jaynes's Book (1976) \\\"The Origin of Consciousness in the Breakdown of the Bicameral Mind\\\" (Part 16 of 21) - An Archaeology of the Fall\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.raziemah.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.raziemah.com\/blog\/?p=9720#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.raziemah.com\/blog\/?p=9720#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.raziemah.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/05\/Slide44-1.png\",\"datePublished\":\"2025-10-14T08:00:00+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.raziemah.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/ad695f570ebd1b2a6f85c4ac5badcd04\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.raziemah.com\/blog\/?p=9720#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.raziemah.com\/blog\/?p=9720\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.raziemah.com\/blog\/?p=9720#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.raziemah.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/05\/Slide44-1.png\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.raziemah.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/05\/Slide44-1.png\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.raziemah.com\/blog\/?p=9720#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.raziemah.com\/blog\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"A First Look at Julian Jaynes’s Book (1976) “The Origin of Consciousness in the Breakdown of the Bicameral Mind” (Part 16 of 21)\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.raziemah.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.raziemah.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"An Archaeology of the Fall\",\"description\":\"A Horror Story by Razie Mah\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.raziemah.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.raziemah.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/ad695f570ebd1b2a6f85c4ac5badcd04\",\"name\":\"admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.raziemah.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/13f66383028a15bc9f1f6f30c43ce372a5a073cb8ec7f9069fa5158a183efe4d?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/13f66383028a15bc9f1f6f30c43ce372a5a073cb8ec7f9069fa5158a183efe4d?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"admin\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.raziemah.com\/blog\/?author=1\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"A First Look at Julian Jaynes's Book (1976) \"The Origin of Consciousness in the Breakdown of the Bicameral Mind\" (Part 16 of 21) - An Archaeology of the Fall","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.raziemah.com\/blog\/?p=9720","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"A First Look at Julian Jaynes's Book (1976) \"The Origin of Consciousness in the Breakdown of the Bicameral Mind\" (Part 16 of 21) - An Archaeology of the Fall","og_description":"0448 But, isn’t the problem of Julian Jaynes’s hypothesis the second item in the following list? 0449 So far, this examination is undecided. Yes, it is a terminological problem, because the double-brain is also one of the proposals.  I know from this examination that the double-brain evolves as a two-chambered cognitive property of the human brain… er… mind.  The bicameral mind pumps interventional sign […]","og_url":"https:\/\/www.raziemah.com\/blog\/?p=9720","og_site_name":"An Archaeology of the Fall","article_published_time":"2025-10-14T08:00:00+00:00","og_image":[{"width":600,"height":400,"url":"https:\/\/www.raziemah.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/05\/Slide44-1.png","type":"image\/png"}],"author":"admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"admin","Est. reading time":"6 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.raziemah.com\/blog\/?p=9720#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.raziemah.com\/blog\/?p=9720"},"author":{"name":"admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.raziemah.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/ad695f570ebd1b2a6f85c4ac5badcd04"},"headline":"A First Look at Julian Jaynes’s Book (1976) “The Origin of Consciousness in the Breakdown of the Bicameral Mind” (Part 16 of 21)","datePublished":"2025-10-14T08:00:00+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.raziemah.com\/blog\/?p=9720"},"wordCount":1247,"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.raziemah.com\/blog\/?p=9720#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.raziemah.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/05\/Slide44-1.png","keywords":["bicameral mind"],"articleSection":["Book Review"],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.raziemah.com\/blog\/?p=9720","url":"https:\/\/www.raziemah.com\/blog\/?p=9720","name":"A First Look at Julian Jaynes's Book (1976) \"The Origin of Consciousness in the Breakdown of the Bicameral Mind\" (Part 16 of 21) - An Archaeology of the Fall","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.raziemah.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.raziemah.com\/blog\/?p=9720#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.raziemah.com\/blog\/?p=9720#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.raziemah.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/05\/Slide44-1.png","datePublished":"2025-10-14T08:00:00+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.raziemah.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/ad695f570ebd1b2a6f85c4ac5badcd04"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.raziemah.com\/blog\/?p=9720#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.raziemah.com\/blog\/?p=9720"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.raziemah.com\/blog\/?p=9720#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.raziemah.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/05\/Slide44-1.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.raziemah.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/05\/Slide44-1.png"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.raziemah.com\/blog\/?p=9720#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.raziemah.com\/blog"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"A First Look at Julian Jaynes’s Book (1976) “The Origin of Consciousness in the Breakdown of the Bicameral Mind” (Part 16 of 21)"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.raziemah.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.raziemah.com\/blog\/","name":"An Archaeology of the Fall","description":"A Horror Story by Razie Mah","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.raziemah.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.raziemah.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/ad695f570ebd1b2a6f85c4ac5badcd04","name":"admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.raziemah.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/13f66383028a15bc9f1f6f30c43ce372a5a073cb8ec7f9069fa5158a183efe4d?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/13f66383028a15bc9f1f6f30c43ce372a5a073cb8ec7f9069fa5158a183efe4d?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"admin"},"url":"https:\/\/www.raziemah.com\/blog\/?author=1"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.raziemah.com\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/9720","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.raziemah.com\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.raziemah.com\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.raziemah.com\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.raziemah.com\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=9720"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.raziemah.com\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/9720\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":9724,"href":"https:\/\/www.raziemah.com\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/9720\/revisions\/9724"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.raziemah.com\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=9720"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.raziemah.com\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=9720"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.raziemah.com\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=9720"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}