[The first two points are familiar.\u00a0 The third point expands Paul\u2019s views about the \u201cflesh\u201d.<\/p>\n
How does it expand Paul\u2019s views?<\/p>\n
Could one say that \u201cno one is unaffected by the sinner\u2019s \u2018flesh\u2019\u201d?<\/p>\n
If\u00a0 \u201cdenial of lawessential<\/sup>3<\/sub>(_2<\/sub>(disposition1<\/sub>))\u201d associates to\u00a0 \u201cway of the flesh\u201d, then the \u201cindependence of lawessential<\/sup> from thinkgroup<\/sup>\u201d corresponds to the third point above (that all are affected by a sinner’s transgression).<\/p>\n The consequences of sin are not limited to the sinner, despite the sinner’s excuses, lawdenial<\/sup>.]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" [The first two points are familiar.\u00a0 The third point expands Paul\u2019s views about the \u201cflesh\u201d. How does it expand Paul\u2019s views? Could one say that \u201cno one is unaffected by the sinner\u2019s \u2018flesh\u2019\u201d? If\u00a0 \u201cdenial of lawessential3(_2(disposition1))\u201d associates to\u00a0 \u201cway of the flesh\u201d, then the \u201cindependence of lawessential from thinkgroup\u201d corresponds to the third point […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[6],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-936","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-the-science-of-original-sin"],"yoast_head":"\n