I comment on the text.\u00a0 Pages 2-6. Comments on the text will appear in square brackets.<\/p>\n
[How would \u201csin\u201d as \u201copposed to God\u2019s will\u201d fit into the intersecting nested forms?<\/p>\n
The New Testament delineates more explicitly than the Old Testament, the normal context of thinkgroup<\/sup>3<\/sub> and the potential of consciencelacking<\/sup>1<\/sub>.<\/p>\n As seen in blog 1.1D, the Old Testament Hebrew words for \u201csin\u201d captured the dynamic of one category emerging from the next lower category, along both the natural philosophic and the moral religious axes.<\/p>\n The parallel nested forms of the vertical axis, were not so apparent, even though the first commandment warned against other religions.\u00a0 The OT revealed the \u201csins\u201d of kings and subjects, kingdoms and peoples, not a \u201csin\u201d that is the principle of it all.<\/p>\n I suppose that Jews began to recognize the Christ when Jesus pointed to \u201csin\u201d as a principle \u2013 or relation \u2013 between thinkgroup<\/sup>3<\/sub> and thinkdivine<\/sup>1<\/sub>.]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" I comment on the text.\u00a0 Pages 2-6. Comments on the text will appear in square brackets. [How would \u201csin\u201d as \u201copposed to God\u2019s will\u201d fit into the intersecting nested forms? The New Testament delineates more explicitly than the Old Testament, the normal context of thinkgroup3 and the potential of consciencelacking1. As seen in blog 1.1D, […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[6],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-868","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-the-science-of-original-sin"],"yoast_head":"\n