0128 Millerman’s essay would make Leo Strauss proud.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Millerman’s argument is exoteric. Strauss and Dugin share an interest in Heidegger. That is not the only feature that they have in common. Therefore, a Straussian should not dismiss Dugin’s political philosophy out of hand.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
0129 The centerpiece turns out to be a translation, by Millerman, of a list of what needs to be done,<\/em> according to Dugin, in order to establish the possibility of a Russian philosophy<\/em>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n 0130 The three tasks involve…<\/p>\n\n\n\n …dismantling Russian archeomodernity. Ironically, for Americans and western Europeans, the task is precisely the opposite. For western Europe, the archeomodern groove is a receptor. For Russia, the archeomodern groove is a trap.<\/p>\n\n\n\n …correctly comprehending the West. Ironically, the West may not be comprehending itself. The modern West is all about science. But, what is science? Is science a purely relational structure composed of the Positivist’s and empirio-schematic judgments? Plus, is there something vulnerable within this relational structure? Does phenomenology exploit that vulnerability? Does Heidegger’s Sein<\/em> correspond to the noumenon?<\/em> What happens to the West if noumena<\/em> take on lives of their own?<\/p>\n\n\n\n ….elaborating a philosophy of chaos<\/em>. The narod<\/em> harbors cautionary wisdom that is ignored by modern political movements, who imitate the practices of the empirio-schematic judgment. Chaos is not necessarily the absence of order<\/em>. Chaos may be the order that cannot be situated by sovereign power<\/em>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n 0131 The placement of Millerman’s translation, along with its surprising content, offers an esoteric message.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Recognize the possibility.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" 0128 Millerman’s essay would make Leo Strauss proud. Millerman’s argument is exoteric. Strauss and Dugin share an interest in Heidegger. That is not the only feature that they have in common. Therefore, a Straussian should not dismiss Dugin’s political philosophy out of hand. 0129 The centerpiece turns out to be a translation, by Millerman, of a list of what […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[173,280,11,6],"tags":[39,305,299,302,306,298,285,106,303,87,304,124,216,301,44,300],"class_list":["post-6079","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-greimas-square","category-intimations-of-political-philosophy","category-our-current-lebenswelt","category-the-science-of-original-sin","tag-category-based-nested-form","tag-communism","tag-dugin","tag-eurasianism","tag-facism","tag-fourth-political-theory","tag-geopolitics","tag-greimas-square","tag-heidegger","tag-liberalism","tag-metaphysics","tag-philosophy","tag-politics","tag-russia","tag-science","tag-strauss"],"yoast_head":"\n