0058 The coronavirus of 2019 ends liberalism as a civic religion.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
These diagrams, inspired by and roughly coherent with Crawford’s text, provide complementary food for thought. The resolution of the mystery of the individual<\/em> marks the death of liberalism<\/em> and the coronation of technocratic progressivism<\/em>as a suprasovereign being<\/em>. A religion<\/em> is supplanted by its heresy<\/em>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n 0059 The liberal religion<\/em> holds a mystery<\/em> as the object that brings all into relation<\/em>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n The individual<\/em> is the intersection of commonsense and vulnerability<\/em>. Crawford notes that individuals have a certain nobility. Liberals never strive to destroy that spiritness. They desire to create a better individual, the old fashioned way, through reform and renewal.<\/p>\n\n\n\n 0060 The religion of technocratic progressivism (which I also call big government (il)liberalism), suspends the lively, spontaneous party that defines individuals, and imposes a three-tiered interscope, where the normal context of the federal government3c<\/sub><\/em> virtually brings the actuality of a state of fear3b<\/sub><\/em> into relation with the potential of a reactionary resistance3a<\/sub><\/em>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n The virtual nested form in the category of thirdness<\/em> is prophetic, since it suggests that an ultimate state of exception2c<\/sub><\/em> will occur when common folk become dangerous to vulnerable persons2b<\/sub><\/em> because of the common folk’s tendency to use commonsense and value self-governance2a<\/sub><\/em> is declared to be “toxic”. In short, “commonsense2a<\/sub>” (in the original sense of the word) is regarded as “criminal2b<\/sub>” (according to the leviathan1b<\/sub>).<\/p>\n\n\n\n 0061 Indeed, what Crawford does not say<\/em> stands just beyond his mournful lament of the tragic end of individual spiritness<\/em>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n What Crawford does not say<\/em> is prophetic.<\/p>\n\n\n\n 0062 The website is UnHerd.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Michael Crawford contributes regularly.<\/p>\n\n\n\n 0063 The overall argument is introduced in Razie Mah’s masterwork,\u00a0How To Define The Word “Religion”<\/em>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n The topic of the individual is discussed in\u00a0A Primer on the Individual in Community<\/em>\u00a0and in points 0081-0086 in\u00a0The First Primer on the Organization Tier,<\/em>\u00a0by Razie Mah, available at smashwords and other e-book venues.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" 0058 The coronavirus of 2019 ends liberalism as a civic religion. These diagrams, inspired by and roughly coherent with Crawford’s text, provide complementary food for thought. The resolution of the mystery of the individual marks the death of liberalism and the coronation of technocratic progressivismas a suprasovereign being. A religion is supplanted by its heresy. 0059 The liberal religion holds a mystery as the object that brings all into […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[10,12,14],"tags":[259,257,255,261,260,264,262,55,265,256,263,238,258,34,50],"class_list":["post-5824","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-defining-religion","category-meaning-underlying-religion","category-message-underlying-religion","tag-althusser","tag-bgill","tag-big-government-illiberalism","tag-category","tag-democracy","tag-hobbes","tag-interpellation","tag-interscope","tag-leviathan","tag-liberal","tag-locke","tag-mystery","tag-novel-coronavirus","tag-peirce","tag-religion"],"yoast_head":"\n