What seems really weird, to me, is that Ted Peters did not even see the Blasphemy involved in the Democratic Party \u2013 er, Progressivist – Takeover of California in the 1990s.<\/p>\n
Instead, he kept his blinders on and focused on Satanism as a type of Private Cult within the spectrum Private Cults that constituted the New Age Movement.\u00a0 He spent over 20 pages wondering whether Satanic Cults really existed.\u00a0 Perhaps, they were figments of therapists\u2019 expectations.\u00a0 Perhaps, they were exaggerations of fundamentalist Christians.<\/p>\n
Peters discussion has the same quality as the scene where the serpent appears in An Archaeology of the Fall<\/em>.\u00a0 Somebody was telling secular therapists and fundamentalist Christians something that they \u2013 on an unconscious level \u2013 already knew.\u00a0 The secular therapists and the fundamentalist Christians thought they knew something \u2013 I mean \u2013 saw \u2018something\u2019.\u00a0 And what they saw was a distorted image of themselves.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" What seems really weird, to me, is that Ted Peters did not even see the Blasphemy involved in the Democratic Party \u2013 er, Progressivist – Takeover of California in the 1990s. Instead, he kept his blinders on and focused on Satanism as a type of Private Cult within the spectrum Private Cults that constituted the […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[6],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-476","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-the-science-of-original-sin"],"yoast_head":"\n