0040 Harvey Winerock is the poster boy of the marxist endgame.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Here is a character at home with the cruelty of the organization tierB<\/sub><\/em>, where asymmetric relations among individuals<\/em> is contiguous with systemic oppression<\/em>. Harvey stands as a gatekeeper for the studios of Hollywood<\/em>. He is a gargoyle. Actresses and actors must speak the proper slogans2a<\/sub> and submit to the proper humiliations1b<\/sub> in order to pass into the bewitched enclave where every asymmetric relation stinks of systemic exploitation<\/em>. Welcome to an institution filled with marxists<\/em>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n 0041 Harvey lives the marxist dream.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Until, of course, he does not.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Why?<\/p>\n\n\n\n Others can play the game. The organization tierB<\/sub><\/em> changes, every so slightly. The identification of oppressor and oppressed2c<\/sub><\/em> shifts out of his favor. Harvey and the actress point fingers in a house of mirrors.<\/p>\n\n\n\n 0042 Hazony writes of marxism as the end of democracy<\/em>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n It is really the end of sanity.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Why do French liberals (aka, “old time democrats”) and American liberals (aka, “tea party republicans”) find common cause in 2020?<\/p>\n\n\n\n They both gaze into the house of mirrors that is postmodern modernism.<\/p>\n\n\n\n There is one encouraging feature about the current scene. American academics, hatching the mantis eggs of the Frankfurt school, succinctly articulate their ever-expanding agendas. Hazony comes close to appreciating the paradox, where any asymmetric relation within the organization tierB<\/sub><\/em> may be interpreted as systemic oppression2c<\/sub><\/em>. If this actuality2c<\/sub> is true and if the organization tierB<\/sub> is full of asymmetric relations (not just full, but bursting with them), then systemic oppression2c<\/sub><\/em> is everywhere, except for once-liberal institutions under the control of marxists2b<\/sub><\/em>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n 0043 What a joke.<\/p>\n\n\n\n InstitutionscC<\/sub> contextualize organizationsB<\/sub>. InstitutionscC<\/sub> justify organizationsB<\/sub> on the basis of righteousness2a<\/sub>. Marxists act as if they are institutionscC<\/sub> without the trappings of an organizationB<\/sub><\/em>. Yet, organized they are. They demand sovereign power3b<\/sub><\/em> in order to achieve the organizational goals2b<\/sub> that actualize their slogans2a<\/sub><\/em>. Harvey Winerock and the movie actress both exemplify the exceptional character of marxists<\/em>. They are exempt from the marxist critique2c<\/sub><\/em> because they self-identify as marxists.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Harvey is promoted by other marxists within the studio system, just as homosexual priests promote their confreres, actresses promote their marxist causes, and public school teachers protest for better wages, in order to get better working conditions. No, nobody here<\/em> engages in asymmetric relations that characterize the organization tierB<\/sub><\/em>. Instead, the avatars of the “be little men” movement<\/em> say that men must become aware how systemic oppression is built into their life, their liberty and their pursuit of happiness<\/em>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n No, marxists cannot see their reflections in the mirror of the world3a<\/sub><\/em>, because their illumination2c<\/sub><\/em> is supposed to be reflected in the mirror of the world3a<\/sub><\/em>. They see their illuminance2c<\/sub>, not themselves, in their slogans2a<\/sub>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n 0044 Academic postmodern marxist disciplines<\/em> are inquiries into how this or that asymmetric relation in the organization tierB<\/sub><\/em> somehow causes (is contiguous with) a relation between oppressor and oppressed2c<\/sub><\/em>. Marxists destroy once-liberal civic institutions from within, simply by identifying and promoting others who are self-identified victims (and extollers2a<\/sub>) of particular types of systemic oppression2c<\/sub>. Indeed, their organizational objectives2b<\/sub><\/em> force others into submitting1b<\/sub> to slogans2a<\/sub> that assign guilt for participation in systemic oppression1a<\/sub><\/em>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n 0045 Ultimately, sovereign power3b<\/sub> is required in order to promulgate their organizational objectives2b<\/sub>. And, this is the ultimatum that Hazony fears. What happens when marxists gain control of the levers of state power?<\/p>\n\n\n\n Yoram Hazony’s article is an intimation of what will be exposed<\/em> when conservative, Christian and nationalist citizens challenge Big Government (il)Liberalism, the hidden and the complete perversion of the Enlightenment tradition.<\/p>\n\n\n\n 0046 Five related works are available at www.smashwords.com.<\/p>\n\n\n\n A Primer on the Category Based Nested Form<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n A Primer on Sensible and Social Construction<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n How To Define the Word “Religion”<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n A Primer on the Family<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n A Primer on the Organization Tier (First and Second)<\/em><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" 0040 Harvey Winerock is the poster boy of the marxist endgame. Here is a character at home with the cruelty of the organization tierB, where asymmetric relations among individuals is contiguous with systemic oppression. Harvey stands as a gatekeeper for the studios of Hollywood. He is a gargoyle. Actresses and actors must speak the proper slogans2a and submit to the proper humiliations1b in order to […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[11,13,6],"tags":[39,85,84,86,55,87,79,83,34,46],"class_list":["post-4731","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-our-current-lebenswelt","category-presence-underlying-religion","category-the-science-of-original-sin","tag-category-based-nested-form","tag-enlightenment","tag-hazony","tag-institution","tag-interscope","tag-liberalism","tag-marxism","tag-organization","tag-peirce","tag-sociology"],"yoast_head":"\n