Summary of text [comment] page 82<\/p>\n
[Schoonenberg made clear that Church doctrine is not wrong.<\/p>\n
Instead, it has been rendered less relevant due to civilizational circumstances.<\/p>\n
In 7764 U0\u2019, Original Sin was labeled mythology (defined by Modernism as equivalent to all other ancient origin stories)<\/em>.<\/p>\n Specialized modern languages (or discourses) set \u2018mythology\u2019 into a framework of \u2018true\u2019 versus \u2018false\u2019 in regards to actuality<\/em>. Such is the scientific point of view. The Story of the Fall<\/em> could not support the actuality of the term \u2018concupiscence\u2019<\/em>.<\/p>\n The modern placement was both true (versus false) and deceptive (versus true).<\/p>\n \u2018Mythology\u2019 may be false in contrast to experimentally verifiable true<\/em>. But, \u2018mythology\u2019 is not make believe in contrast to scientifically believable<\/em>. Instead, \u2018mythology\u2019 is true as opposed to deceptive<\/em> or deceptive as opposed to true<\/em>.]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" Summary of text [comment] page 82 [Schoonenberg made clear that Church doctrine is not wrong. Instead, it has been rendered less relevant due to civilizational circumstances. In 7764 U0\u2019, Original Sin was labeled mythology (defined by Modernism as equivalent to all other ancient origin stories). Specialized modern languages (or discourses) set \u2018mythology\u2019 into a framework […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[6],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-3035","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-the-science-of-original-sin"],"yoast_head":"\n