Summary of text [comment] page 77<\/p>\n
Under sinful circumstances, a sinner may choose a good on \u201chis\u201d own, but not the moral good that is the object of virtue<\/em>. \u201cHe\u201d can choose only limited goods, provided, of course, that \u201chis\u201d dispositions have not already been trained by sinful habitual actions.<\/p>\n [Here, the model of intersecting nested forms<\/em> assists.<\/p>\n Even when consciencelacking<\/sup> has made the person unfree (that is, dependent on the thinkgroup)<\/sup>, the parallel vertical nested form of thinkdivine<\/sup> still interpellates.]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" Summary of text [comment] page 77 Under sinful circumstances, a sinner may choose a good on \u201chis\u201d own, but not the moral good that is the object of virtue. \u201cHe\u201d can choose only limited goods, provided, of course, that \u201chis\u201d dispositions have not already been trained by sinful habitual actions. [Here, the model of intersecting […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[6],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-2775","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-the-science-of-original-sin"],"yoast_head":"\n