Summary of text [comment] page 69<\/p>\n
[\u2018Our states of existence\u2019 (of either grace or self-destruction) are tumultuous because they contain contradictions.<\/p>\n
On top of that, \u2018our states of existence\u2019 face apparently incompatible normal contexts. A divine object (such as an idol) may be incompatible with our human nature (to participate in divine nature; such as, triadic relations). Normal contexts obey the laws of exclusivity. The incompatibilities, manifested as contradictions in \u2018our states of existence\u2019, may drive conversion from one exclusive normal context to another.<\/p>\n
The tension between the normal contexts and the realms of possibility<\/em> constitutes a God-source and human-subject polarity within the intersection<\/em>.<\/p>\n Finally, \u2018our states of existence\u2019 belong (as an actuality) in a content-level nested form. This content-level form describes the person. However, this nested form is not articulated. It models the person\u2019s unconscious.<\/p>\n Thus, Schoonenberg’s word \u2018counterpole\u2019 is rendered as both \u2018God-source and human-subject\u2019 and \u2018God-source and human-subject within the person\u2019.]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" Summary of text [comment] page 69 [\u2018Our states of existence\u2019 (of either grace or self-destruction) are tumultuous because they contain contradictions. On top of that, \u2018our states of existence\u2019 face apparently incompatible normal contexts. A divine object (such as an idol) may be incompatible with our human nature (to participate in divine nature; such as, […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[10,6],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-2393","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-defining-religion","category-the-science-of-original-sin"],"yoast_head":"\n