Summary of text [comment] page 47<\/p>\n
[This leads to a question:<\/p>\n
What about scientific discovery?<\/p>\n
Scientific discoveries alter the way we express lawessential<\/sup>, especially those features that exist independently of us. In Latin, the term is ens reale<\/em>.<\/p>\n Notably, there is a difference in speed of response for each type of think.<\/p>\n For example, accounts of a new discovery may give political or some other advantage to a particular thinkgroup<\/sup>. They interpret lawessential<\/sup> in their own favor, thus producing an affirmative form of lawdenial<\/sup>. They will claim the discovery works to their benefit. Once these claims are debunked, these interpretations end up as fodder for thinkdivine<\/sup>. The claim itself remains in lawessential<\/sup>.<\/p>\n This fits the definition of “scandal”: “a fascination of the surface that blocks access to seeing deeper”.]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" Summary of text [comment] page 47 [This leads to a question: What about scientific discovery? Scientific discoveries alter the way we express lawessential, especially those features that exist independently of us. In Latin, the term is ens reale. Notably, there is a difference in speed of response for each type of think. For example, accounts […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[6],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1798","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-the-science-of-original-sin"],"yoast_head":"\n