In chapter 7, Wiley covered (pre-2012) feminist views of Original Sin.\u00a0 Consider this conclusion, stated with two substitutions:<\/p>\n
\u201cXY theologians have used the doctrine of original sin to denigrate XX, blame them for evil, and prohibit them from full participation in the life of the church.\u00a0 By deeming XX\u2019s subordination a divine punishment, instead of exposing human bias, the doctrine reinforced a cultural ideology of XY superiority. \u2026 A XX reconstruction of the doctrine of original sin calls for an anthropology expunged of \u201cXY over XX\u201d hierarchy and privilege, a critical theory of history, and a social analysis of the dynamics of power and ideology.\u201d<\/p>\n
Does this sound intimidating?\u00a0 Does this sound like a project that involves selective attention, selective intelligence, selective reason and selective affections?\u00a0 Is anyone who disagrees automatically guilt of a variety of charges?<\/p>\n
Or, are these questions false leads?<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
In chapter 7, Wiley covered (pre-2012) feminist views of Original Sin.\u00a0 Consider this conclusion, stated with two substitutions: \u201cXY theologians have used the doctrine of original sin to denigrate XX, blame them for evil, and prohibit them from full participation in the life of the church.\u00a0 By deeming XX\u2019s subordination a divine punishment, instead of […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[6],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-178","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-the-science-of-original-sin"],"yoast_head":"\n