Lately, I have been wresting (if blogging can be called that) with Teilhard de Chardin\u2019s notion of a \u201cscandal\u201d in biology.<\/p>\n
God declared His Creation “good” in Genesis. However, natural evil is intrinsic to evolution.\u00a0 This is a scandal.<\/p>\n
Coincidently, I came across a book on scandal in the tradition of Rene Girard, entitled Beneath the Veil of Strange Verses: Reading Scandalous Texts<\/i>, by Jeremiah L. Alberg (East Lansing: Michigan University Press).<\/p>\n
So, a diversion is in order.<\/p>\n
My electronic book, An Archaeology of the Fall<\/i> (2012), complements Alberg’s exploration, in a way that would make Flannery O\u2019Connor proud.\u00a0 If you read it, you will see what I mean.<\/p>\n
You will also see why Rene Girard has appeared on my radar, not as dramatically as Charles Peirce and John Deely, or Jacques Lacan and Slavoj Zizek, or Michel Foucault and Giorgio Agamben, but there, nevertheless.\u00a0 So far, I have contemplated his work through the eyes of his admirers.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Lately, I have been wresting (if blogging can be called that) with Teilhard de Chardin\u2019s notion of a \u201cscandal\u201d in biology. God declared His Creation “good” in Genesis. However, natural evil is intrinsic to evolution.\u00a0 This is a scandal. Coincidently, I came across a book on scandal in the tradition of Rene Girard, entitled Beneath […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[9],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1467","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-psychology-and-the-scapegoat-girard"],"yoast_head":"\n