Summary of text [comment] page 46<\/p>\n
[Schoonenberg\u2019s waffling, described in the previous blogs, leads to a question:<\/p>\n
What makes the spontaneous order of human culture (in unconstrained complexity) different from the spontaneous orders of biology (of ecology, environment and matter \u2013 as well as \u2013 perhaps, of the human culture in constrained complexity)?<\/p>\n
Schoonenberg did not know that he formulated a question that has never been asked before (1962). Still, he listed some fundamentals that could go into an answer.]<\/p>\n
The free person possesses ‘his’ own value for eternity.<\/p>\n
Each person is touched by the grace of God, who wishes for all ‘men’ to be saved.<\/p>\n
Sin and virtue manifest attributes (especially, the final impenitence or total self-giving, respectively) that do not fit into the concept of \u201cstatistical necessity\u201d because they are categorical attributes.<\/p>\n
[To me, these criteria indicate that freedom and morality in our current Lebenswelt mark another dimension in addition to the dimensions of ecology-environment-matter.]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Summary of text [comment] page 46 [Schoonenberg\u2019s waffling, described in the previous blogs, leads to a question: What makes the spontaneous order of human culture (in unconstrained complexity) different from the spontaneous orders of biology (of ecology, environment and matter \u2013 as well as \u2013 perhaps, of the human culture in constrained complexity)? Schoonenberg did […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[6],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1451","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-the-science-of-original-sin"],"yoast_head":"\n