[We do not see evil when we intervene in a natural system in order to save something.\u00a0 This completely amazes me because interventions intended to \u201cpreserve a particular feature of a spontaneous order\u201d only causes the spontaneous order to adapt as if it had less energy going through the system. Or, the system faces greater entropy.<\/p>\n
Here, the ongoing rejection of the concept of \u201cdesign\u201d by secular fundamentalists (who ridicule William Paley and the proponents of Intelligent Design equally) produces an ironic situation.\u00a0 The unconscious denial that \u201cthe environmentalist projects design into nature\u2019s spontaneous order\u201d blinds the environmental engineer to the potential of negative dynamic adaptive response to ‘his’ intervention by the spontaneous order.<\/p>\n
In sum, the environmentalist sees design in nature, refuses to admit that ‘he’ sees designs, constructs an intervention, then is surprised at the unintended consequences, but accounts ‘himself’ blameless.]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
[We do not see evil when we intervene in a natural system in order to save something.\u00a0 This completely amazes me because interventions intended to \u201cpreserve a particular feature of a spontaneous order\u201d only causes the spontaneous order to adapt as if it had less energy going through the system. Or, the system faces greater […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[6],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1415","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-the-science-of-original-sin"],"yoast_head":"\n