Summary of text [comment] page 45<\/p>\n
[So why call failures in a spontaneous order \u201cevil\u201d?<\/p>\n
What is evil about a system that comes into being on the basis of trying out combinations based on simple rules?<\/p>\n
Each combination \u2013 configuration \u2013 is a formal trial within the order.\u00a0 The longevity of any particular combination rests on instrumental causes and formal elements as well as the challenges that arise from the creature’s situation.<\/p>\n
The failure of any type of configuration registers as a limitation, a failure of a formal element. Each success registers as a success of a formal element.<\/p>\n
Every spontaneous order is anti-entropic.\u00a0 It requires the expenditure of more energy than is retained by the system.\u00a0 Every spontaneous order adapts to its circumstances more readily that any designed order.\u00a0 Every spontaneous order accepts failure as part of itself\u2026.<\/p>\n
\u2026which is precisely what we do not do.\u00a0 We do not accept \u201cfailure\u201d.\u00a0 We designate it as \u201cevil\u201d.\u00a0 Why?]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Summary of text [comment] page 45 [So why call failures in a spontaneous order \u201cevil\u201d? What is evil about a system that comes into being on the basis of trying out combinations based on simple rules? Each combination \u2013 configuration \u2013 is a formal trial within the order.\u00a0 The longevity of any particular combination rests […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[6],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1409","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-the-science-of-original-sin"],"yoast_head":"\n