Summary of text [comment] pages 43 and 44<\/p>\n
[What was de Chardin trying to convey?<\/p>\n
He wrote four generations ago.\u00a0 2013 is 80 years past 1933.<\/p>\n
He was not acquainted with Hayek\u2019s notion of \u201cspontaneous order\u201d.<\/p>\n
The \u201cecology\u201d and the \u201cenvironment\u201d are spontaneous orders.<\/p>\n
The ecology and environment are beautiful to behold.\u00a0 Each appears to be a \u201cunity\u201d that puts \u201cmultiplicities\u201d into context.<\/p>\n
Is this what de Chardin envisioned?]<\/p>\n
Schoonenberg quoted de Chardin at length.<\/p>\n
I consider this quote in the next few blogs.]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Summary of text [comment] pages 43 and 44 [What was de Chardin trying to convey? He wrote four generations ago.\u00a0 2013 is 80 years past 1933. He was not acquainted with Hayek\u2019s notion of \u201cspontaneous order\u201d. The \u201cecology\u201d and the \u201cenvironment\u201d are spontaneous orders. The ecology and environment are beautiful to behold.\u00a0 Each appears to […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[6],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1355","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-the-science-of-original-sin"],"yoast_head":"\n