[Here is the scenario for “gravity” that relies on the interscoping nested forms:<\/p>\n
Knowledge3<\/sub>( human action2<\/sub>( subject1<\/sub>))<\/p>\n Will3<\/sub>( subject2<\/sub>( object1<\/sub>))<\/p>\n If I consider \u201cgravity2<\/sub>\u201d as the \u201crealm of actuality2<\/sub> in tension with the intersubjective3<\/sub> and the subjective\u00ad1<\/sub>\u201d then \u201cgravity2<\/sub>\u201d precisely reflects \u201cthe aspect of human action2<\/sub> corresponding to the subject2<\/sub>\u201d.<\/p>\n Does this definition of “gravity2<\/sub>” accord with the Dutch logic table?<\/p>\n It seems so.<\/p>\n The more grave2<\/sub> the sin or virtue, the more imprisoned or free the subject becomes.]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" [Here is the scenario for “gravity” that relies on the interscoping nested forms: Knowledge3( human action2( subject1)) Will3( subject2( object1)) If I consider \u201cgravity2\u201d as the \u201crealm of actuality2 in tension with the intersubjective3 and the subjective\u00ad1\u201d then \u201cgravity2\u201d precisely reflects \u201cthe aspect of human action2 corresponding to the subject2\u201d. Does this definition of “gravity2” […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[6],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1275","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-the-science-of-original-sin"],"yoast_head":"\n