Summary of text [comment] page 19<\/p>\n
[Ironically, this accounting is parodied in this life, when a thinkgroup<\/sup> projects a thinkopposing_the_object<\/sup> and conscienceanti-object <\/sup>onto a suspected enemy.<\/p>\n Anyone guilty of some minor infraction, being at the wrong place at the wrong time, or daring to think that \u2018he\u2019 could fix a problem, is suddenly held \u201cresponsible\u201d as \u201ca person who holds an evil ideology3<\/sub> and lives a false conscience1<\/sub>\u201d.\u00a0 Often, the person is also accused of a gross, uncivil and tormented disposition1<\/sub>.<\/p>\n Here, “two normal contexts3<\/sub> (thinkpro-object<\/sup>3<\/sub> and lawdenial<\/sup>3<\/sub>)” constitute “the accused person2<\/sub> (giving ‘him’ a new body2<\/sub>)” by bringing ‘him’ into relation with “the possibilities inherent in the accused actually having a conscience1<\/sub> and dispositions1<\/sub>“.<\/p>\n The only caveat is that the accusers define the person’s conscience1<\/sub> and dispositions1<\/sub>, rather than the person.\u00a0 Thus, the mob, that great frothy beast (today, amplified through mainstream television and newspapers), turns on a soul who exists only in the realm of potential, as if the accused imaginary person was actual.<\/p>\n Look, our eyes can see an image of a real person being accused.\u00a0 There ‘he’ is, on the television. \u00a0So it must be true.<\/p>\n In 2012, Mr. Romney never saw it coming.\u00a0 The poor soul became the person he never was.\u00a0 He was damned in a parody of divine judgment.\u00a0 He was demonized by the projections of the accusers.<\/p>\n Mr. Romney still does not know what happened to him.\u00a0 One wonders whether, in a farcical version of some tale written Edgar Allen Poe, he will awaken in his crypt.\u00a0 Will he ever face the accusers?\u00a0 Will the accusers ever face him?<\/p>\n \u201cResponsibility\u201d is \u201cholding a possibility accountable\u201d.\u00a0 This \u201cholding\u201d can only be accomplished by \u201ccreating a context where possibility comes into relation with actuality\u201d.\u00a0 Thinkpro-object<\/sup> creates those contexts by projecting thinkanti-object<\/sup> onto innocent souls.<\/p>\n The question arises: Will God do the same at the Resurrection?<\/p>\n The answer is that He cannot.\u00a0 God cannot lie to Himself.]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" Summary of text [comment] page 19 [Ironically, this accounting is parodied in this life, when a thinkgroup projects a thinkopposing_the_object and conscienceanti-object onto a suspected enemy. Anyone guilty of some minor infraction, being at the wrong place at the wrong time, or daring to think that \u2018he\u2019 could fix a problem, is suddenly held \u201cresponsible\u201d […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[6],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1047","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-the-science-of-original-sin"],"yoast_head":"\n